Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[dissonance]

Hey Shannon, Happy New Years!
What are you your thoughts on this...

While I was meditating, I kinda thought a bit about DMSI. I kinda thought to myself an analogy of why I feel FRM without H&C isn't ideal. First though, I noticed you talk a lot now about aiming to remove H&C, and only have FRM when FRM is so powerful that we don't need H&C, so that people can *finally* execute the goal of getting themselves laid. However, if I remember correctly, DMSI stands for Develop MAXIMUM Sexual Irristibility, not... get laid at all costs (ok not ALL costs, but you know what I mean). I can't imagine how one can become their MOST sexually attractive self WITHOUT healing. Or clearing. Sure, it'll help people get laid if they have no fear and just go through the actions that would lead to them getting laid, but it wouldn't shape them into the version of themselves that would be maximally sexually attractive.

What do you suppose happens when and if you execute the script fully? Sex, whatever amount you agree to. And just because you can't imagine something doesn't mean it can't be. I am aiming for a version of DMSI that does not include H&C because that seems to me to be a trap for "oh, this feels good, let's just hide here forever, endlessly healing and clearing while not really doing Jack Schitt!"

I get that but wouldn't you agree that a person's level of sexual attraction would be higher if they had stronger self beliefs, less negative beliefs, and didn't have past (far past or recent past) events weighing them down with all that negative energy, causing them to subconsciously believe and think and feel negative things, etc?

For me, it feels like FRM without H&C is like punching my fist as hard as i can through a glass sphere that is designed to shatter into sharp shards so that I can grab a golden egg, because hell, I just don't fear the actions. FRM with H&C, I'd imagine would be like me using the neccessary tools to carve a hole in the glass to grab the egg.

What you're describing is a fear. You're basically saying, "I'm afraid that by letting go of fear, I'm going to get hurt." In other words... you're not done with FRM, and you're fighting it. You're also asking for H&C because "that will save me!" when really, H&C has so far only provided people with an excuse to heal and clear instead of execute.

Or maybe applied to a seduction scenario, maybe with only FRM, let's say I subconsciously know what to say/do/bodylanguage etc, and I do it, fearlessly. However, what i say/do/bodylanguage wouldn't have the natural, genuine, true-to-self finesse and vibe that I would have if I truly believed, felt synonymous with, embodied, felt deserving of, felt worthy of, etc of saying/doing-with-bodylanguage/having-a-certain-vocal-tonality, if I had the H&C.

There's no reason it "wouldn't have the natural, genuine, true-to-self finesse and vibe that I would have if I truly believed, felt synonymous with, embodied, felt deserving of, felt worthy of, etc of saying/doing-with-bodylanguage/having-a-certain-vocal-tonality". Fear removal isn't "pulling the wool over your eyes" and getting you to do and believe things that aren't true. It's removing the fear so you can stop hiding behind excuses like these and actually achieve the goal of the program you paid for.

What about instead of trying to have FRM replace H&C completely, just develop both to have the most individual power while being most synergistically paired, working together?

Anyways, anyone else have thoughts on this?

We are going to have development on FRM for a while yet, so regardless, it is too early to decide to scrap FRM only. DMSI-C is coming out most likely this month so I can see what FRM and H&C do together. It is possible that the combination is the answer we have been looking for. If so, yay! But I am suspicious of that because of what you guys have done in response to H&C in the past. Plus, my goal is ONE program stage with ONE "version" per release, so we don't have to have A and B and C and D and E and F and G. H&C almost certainly does not fit in with that because it apparently is much more convenient for you guys to just hide in it instead of execute, and you never want to turn it off when you're done because you're never done. It's too convenient and cozy. So my solid goal is to get rid of H&C and get your asses in gear.

Hmm I see okay. What about scripting it so that it's not required for H&C to be "done" until the B-script (or D-script) kicks in? I remember you saying something like B will automatically kick in once A is done working, or something like that?