Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

If it will aid in doing that, it's already happening. And if not, no, it will not. The person to be affected must match the targeting pattern.

And I'll say it again, for the millionth time, targeting specific people is a bad move.

Then why on 3.2 I became obsessed over this girl E? And when she passively rejected me, the pain was only on 3.2 and it wouldn't leave me (my journal has it all). But when I was on MLS, I barely thought about her.

Now, on 3.3 a girl from my gym is on my mind. Then what should I do if I can't target her specifically?

Shannon, this is from DMSI description page: "be aware that it is designed to get you to sexually seduce everyone you want to have sex with."

And you are saying targeting specific people is a bad move. Don't you think these two are conflicting? If not, why?

Then why on 3.2 I became obsessed over this girl E? And when she passively rejected me, the pain was only on 3.2 and it wouldn't leave me (my journal has it all). But when I was on MLS, I barely thought about her.

There is nothing in DMSI that causes obsession. You'll have to look at other things to explain that.

MLS focuses you on learning, not sex.

Now, on 3.3 a girl from my gym is on my mind. Then what should I do if I can't target her specifically?

Focusing on a specific person is fine as long as you are not using manifestation methods to influence them. That crosses the line into taking away their freedom of choice, and it is a bad choice of actions for that reason.

Shannon, this is from DMSI description page: "be aware that it is designed to get you to sexually seduce everyone you want to have sex with."

And you are saying targeting specific people is a bad move. Don't you think these two are conflicting? If not, why?

I am talking about using manifestation and other techniques that take away their free will. Not "I'm attracted to her, so I'll focus my interest on her while I'm on DMSI.

By this logic, wouldn't any seduction at all which is designed to evoke a feeling of attraction from a woman be removing their free will? Wouldn't dmsi itself which is designed to use your sexual aura to create attraction in women who otherwise would not be attracted be removing their free will? I fail to see how having a specific target would be any different to general targets that are affected by your aura.

Do you really think it would have taken this much work to make DMSI work if I was not trying to preserve free will on the part of both the user and the affected?

There is a big difference between influencing someone and taking away their ability to choose for themselves. One is persuasion, and one is coercion. We want to persuade, which gives them the choice of what to do. We do not want to coerce, which does not.

When a woman puts on makeup, is she forcing you to find her more sexually attractive? No. When she puts on a perfume with the intent of becoming more sexually attractive, is she forcing you? No. When she wears a sexy dress, is she forcing you? No. She is trying to use her charms to persuade and influence. But you still have free will, even if your animal brain is responding on instinct, and you can still choose to refuse her sex.

If she and her friends hold you down and force you to have sex with them, or get you drunk and take advantage of you when you can't physically stop them, that's taking away free will.

DMSI does nothing to take away free will. But by carelessly using manifestation (and it can be done intentionally as well) it is relatively easy to take away someone's free will. Manifesting a relationship or a specific outcome with a specific person forces that to happen, regardless of what they would have chosen had they had a say in the matter, and can go so far as to control their mind and emotions to result in that outcome.

If you use manifestation to achieve an outcome of having sex with a hot redheaded server you know from your favorite lunch restaurant, when you know that she would not have chosen to do that on her own, you are taking away her free will to make her own choice. If she would have done it anyway, you wouldn't need to use manifestation. Any time you use manifestation to achieve a specific outcome with a specific person, you are taking away their free will to make their own choice in the matter. The consequences of such an action are severe, and I can attest to that from having made that mistake myself, before I knew what I was doing with this stuff.