10-05-2018, 05:34 AM
(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-05-2018, 05:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-05-2018, 05:06 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.
And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?
It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.
I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?
You're definitely not following. People are using that to shut down execution by not allowing any sex. Out of fear. When they have no real reason otherwise to do so. People who are free and clear to have sex with whomever offers. And are getting offers. Which they do not allow. Because of fear.
The idea is that you have an abundance of offers of sex and interested parties, and you decide who, when, where and how much.
But switching it to "as much sex as the user wants" does and changes nothing in this case, because the user's dominant desire is what they already have, or it wouldn't be what they already have. And in almost all cases of resistance on this point, it will be because the dominant part of them desires not to have sex, and it is dominating the will of their conscious desire to have sex. In some cases, it is even dominating their conscious awareness that they even want sex.
So no amount of alpha or beta or whatever is going to matter. What you allow of what you're being offered is what you want. And what you're being offered is an entirely different thing. The whole goal of DMSI is sex on demand.
I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.
Okay, Sarge, let's go back a bit and clarify something.
In life, whatever you are experiencing is the result of whatever your dominant desires are. And your dominant desires are often those of your subconscious, and disagree with those of your conscious. When this happens, people show up here looking for a solution.
So in that sense, your experiences have been, so far, what your dominant will has been, which is differing from your conscious desires, so it must be your subconscious desires and will.
Now, this disagreement is blocking you from getting very far, even with DMSI, although from what I have seen you report it seems DMSI is making some difference. And your issue once you have it offered isn't shutting it down, because you allow it to the best of your ability at a conscious level.
What I'm talking about is people who, if they cannot stop DMSI from executing, shut down their interest in the offers they get. They use that as a defense of last resort, refusing what executing DMSI has accomplished.
So in those cases where they execute DMSI and its instructions become their dominant will while they do, those people achieve the goals of the program because they are executing the script, but then they refuse to allow sex or escalation on what their previous execution caused and procured for them.
For example, there have been reports from people who said that they had hotties becoming interested and then they found excuses why they should reject those advances. Or they talk themselves into believing they really were not advances or interest, and ignore them. These are a refusal to ALLOW SEX. They have access to it, but they refuse to allow it.
Because, out of fear, they don't want it. And in this case, what you want and what you allow are the same thing.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!