Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.

That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.

While I'm not worried about getting manipulated into having more kids, my concern is the women we're disqualifying b/c they have no interest in having kids, ever, with anyone. A lot of women are just looking to have a good time. At the least, adding in "fun" instead of going full-court-press on "baby rabies" seems like the better route to me.

I'm for whatever Shannon deems best after modeling the options.

Remember that DMSI is unisex, and women can use it to affect men too.

But I will be checking on the best option between focusing on the current goal, which seems to produce baby rabies; sex for fun; or some combination of the two.