Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[lano1106]

He did all that without DMSI. Imagine that.

I wonder if a guy like that would just entertain the idea of trying out DMSI for the purpose of having even more than what he already has...

If you see women as "objects" to game or sex as "an end goal", then yeah the idea of having "even more" would be appealing.

If instead you love women as they are and view sex as just one step in having a connection, then you'll experience what he experienced.

yeah sure. You are right. A guy that keep track of his lay count and surpass 6,000 lays obviously love women as they are and view sex as just one step in having a connection like you say

I did some quick math. 6,000 lays over 40 years is 150 women per year. About 3 new women per week. The guy love so much women as they are that he invented the deep connection fast food style.

He worked as a nightclub promoter. His access to women with a high turnover makes it easy for him to get laid.

It really isn't that hard to believe. If you're interested in connecting with women and actually enjoying them, when it comes time to leave, they'll want to leave with you.

I never said that it was hard to believe that he did that.

I was highlighting the oddity that you find a guy laying over 6,000 girls connecting with women in contrast to objectifying them.

While, in my definition, the simple act of keeping a laycount is by definition an objectification and I could be wrong but after a certain point, each girl become just a number.

That being said, I'm not making a judgement if it is good or bad. As long as everyone is consenting and happy, it is all good in my book.

However, I felt like you were insinuating that *I* was objectifying women because I was curious about what DMSI would do to a guy with a 6,000 laycount and that him instead was connecting with women hence was having a lot of sex. I didn't like what you were suggesting

FYI, you can have a lot of sex without ever connecting with your multiple partners...