Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[dissonance]

Thank you Shannon for clarifying that. Much of my theory is now down the drain, which suits me fine.

I just want to say this about DMSI:

A.) The sales pages clearly states that it's experimental.

B.) Just because you haven't achieved the design goal with DMSI, doesn't mean others haven't. So is it DMSI, or is it you?

Even *I* haven't achieved design goal, unless you count my wife. I know why I haven't, and I have resisted each version up to this point. Shannon told me, many versions ago, that I may find ways to resist the entire 3.x line. But (!) I'm not going around blaming the program. He's working diligently on adjusting the program, with each successive version, to work for most everyone. As this happens, 6G comes closer to fruition. I'm happy to be a part of that, myself. Furthermore, the value I've received has far outweighed the investment.

I get value out of it too, I'm not saying I don't. How many times have I praised DMSI?

BUT, like you said, it's experimental which means: it's not working perfectly. YET, whenever someone has anything to say in that regard, it's all "it's your fault, not this highly experimental sub that isn't finished yet. No, that couldn't be it, it's all you." Bro, how does that even make sense?

The cool thing about the 180 phenomenon that I had with the 8.5 is that this same phenomenon has been happening for me with every installment of DMSI but it has gotten less and less bad with each version, bringing me closer and closer to sex. So it's obviously getting better.

Anyhow, all I'm trying to do is point out the flaws and suggest ways to overcome them.

I had this crazy idea that DMSI was only designed to get girls you already wanted, but Shannon says that's not the case so I can forget that theory. I'm not sorry I'm wrong on that because it renews my hope in the program. But again, I must stress that if DMSI needs me to learn PUA then it's not much of a tool. Therefore, it is my sincere hope that it will provide me with the vibe, calibration, and savvy needed to become a successful seducer of hot girls.

DMSI doesn't need you to learn PUA. If you feel that is the case, or believe that DMSI/OE led you to that, it is because that may have been the only way your subconscious could think of to advance to the goal. But there is nothing in DMSI that suggests to you to learn PUA, or demands or requires it. In fact I give very clear and specific instructions on how to become irresistibly sexually attractive without doing that.

Definitely doesn't need PUA. I would talk to coworkers naturally without trying to seduce or game or anything like that, just normal everyday small talk or work talk or casual shootin' the shit for fun kinda thing, and they would clearly show signs of sexual attraction. Customers as well.

One of the most funny (to me) examples is a coworker who every time she comes up to me to say something (work related; i work in a restaurant), she gets really close and almost always pushes her breasts onto me. I've never actually shown any sexual interest in her (except for NOT shying away when she gets that physically close and in contact with me), but she was doing this from the moment she met me.

Almost all female coworkers literally have shown or do show attraction to me in some form or another, and I never use anything PUA on them.