Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

[quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279']
[quote='CatMan' pid='206023' dateline='1537432675']


I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.

I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together!
I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's.

Of course you have to echo this. You and CatMan have much the same issue and reasons for why you're still in the positions you find yourselves in, so you agree with each other. You can't get past your fears and the limiting beliefs that "protect you" from them (and hold those fears in place), so you conclude that the program is faulty, the design is faulty, it's too ambitious, etc.

We already know DMSI "works". It just does not work as intended yet. If it didn't work, nobody would have achieved the design goals.