Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

Ah ok. Most of the time when talking about DMSI you're very confident so I found that odd when you said:

So if there is a way to do it without taking away free will, then I will probably do that. Otherwise, probably not.

.
That'd realistically mean that if there is no way to achieve DMSI's goal without impeding free will then DMSI was doomed since the start.
Yeah, it helps with developing 6G though...

Your logic skills need a little tweaking.

We are already getting results. Some people are executing and achieving the design goal. That means:

It is definitely possible.

The thing is, it is me trying to persuade you to persuade someone else to do something that is against their social conditioning. So for ANYONE to have achieved the design goal AT ALL is a miracle. That alone means it is possible. So there is no need to worry about whether it is possible; there is a need to consider what percentage of you I can motivate to actually cooperate, instead of fighting the goal you paid to achieve, and then getting mad at me because you prevented it from happening; and then what percentage of the population we can successfully influence to act also, without taking away their free will.

The moment the first person achieved the design goal, the war was over. We won. Now the rest is just making it as effective as possible. And I am confident that there is enough change coming that DMSI will not only be successful in it's last version or two, but it will be a good seller for many years (and possibly decades) to come.

And 6G will benefit from all this, and DMSI will probably end up being a 6G.