06-06-2018, 06:13 AM
(06-04-2018, 05:47 PM)samba99 Wrote:(06-04-2018, 03:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-03-2018, 05:05 PM)Leo1990 Wrote:(06-03-2018, 05:03 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: Shannon,
I’ve been having an urge for a while now to start using pheromones again, last night I gave in and applied some L2K V2 and I feel that it actually led me to some mild success- made out with this milf and got her contact although couldn’t close due to logistics.
I went ahead and ordered some Am nos today.
Could it be that executing the pheromone optimizer in DMSI has led me to start applying pheromones? Or is this pure resistance and nothing else.
Shannon in his journal said he used pheros. Though this was an earlier version... guessing 3.0 I think.
I don't use pheromones the way you guys do, or for the same reasons. I use artificial pheromones to alter my reality to a probability line that achieves a goal I have in mind. Which can be something completely unrelated to sex. And requires predicitive models.
Do you use it similar to how alchemist do? Or this is something completely different
I don't follow what people call alchemy these days. There are a variety of definitions. I do my own thing, and whatever it resembles, I don't know because I am too busy doing my own thing to pay attention to what others are doing and what they call it.
I use artificial pheromones as keys in modeling how to experience the future I desire to experience sometimes. If I have run out of keys in other directions, sometimes I will use pheromones. Basically a key in this sense is something that alters the probability line on which I experience reality. So for example, you will alter your probability line and therefore reality and experience thereof, by putting on 1, 2, 3, etc. sprays of a pheromone product.
If you put on a number of sprays from the right size sprayer of the right type of or blend of pheromones, you can experience more or less of the outcome you are aiming for.
Let's say I want to have sex with my girlfriend, but she's upset or depressed and isn't interested. I have tried to get her interested by touch and failed; talking sexy has only annoyed her. I have modeled all my subliminal aphrodisiac options and none of them produce the desired result. So I start going through and modeling each of my pheromone options, and pick the one that results in the closest to the result I want. Then I go through and model how many sprays to wear to bet the best result possible. Then I might go through again and model that outcome, along with all the options for other pheromones again; and repeat the process until I have achieved my goal, or the best result possible.
That is, in fact, how I create my pheromone mixes.
Let's say I go through and model Taboo, Evolve, Ascend, PSE, Barely Legal, Cohesion and SOB. I get the best result from, say, Cohesion.
This tells me two things: 1. She is either experiencing PMS or she is already menstruating, and 2. Cohesion is going to be the primary pheromone mix that advances me to achieving mutually consensual sex with her.
Then I model how many sprays to wear to achieve my goal. Let's say the answer comes back being 6 sprays. It us usually 2, 3, 5, or 6.
Now I go back through and model 6 sprays of cohesion with all of the pheromone mixes except cohesion, plus just the cohesion by itself, one at a time, and let's say that now, 6x Cohesion + XiST wins. So I model 6x Cohesion with 0 to 6 sprays of XiST. Let's say 5 sprays of Xist + 6x Cohesion wins.
Now I repeat the process, except I model 6x Cohesion + 5x Xist and then one at a time, all the other pheromone mixes that I have not yet added. Let's say this time, Evolve wins. So again, I now model 6x Cohesion, 5x XiST and 0-6 sprays Evolve. Let's say 1x Evolve wins. The mix is now:
6x Cohesion
5x XiST
1x Evolve.
If I continue, I may end up using as many as 5 different mixes. Usually the mix will be 2 to 4 ingredients. All of the mixes you see in my journal on DiscoverXS are created this way, and while I do re-use mixes often, each one is created specifically tailored to a unique situation and person when it is created.
I use this sort of process to model a lot of things I use to achieve my goals.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!