Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shannon]

Hey Shannon. I'm greatful for this wonderful tape called 'ASC'. Although I'm mad at what's happened lately.
At some point this tape got me so confident, I felt like I could see the matrix. I was awesome, eye contact awesome!, Body language was super dominant and flawless. My speech and tonality were on point. I even got the attractive sales girl practically begging for attention. But that only lasted for about 6 days. I wake up on day 7 thinking I'm still in God mode, until I realize I'm back to the way I was 6 days ago. Not like I'm completely lacking of confidence now, I'm just saying I am currently nothing close to the way I was in those six days. What the heck?. Why did ASC get me there only to take me back later? I'm angry at this. It's been about a week since then, still not back to that mode in spite of my 5hrs minimum a day commitment to listening.

PS. I've been listening to ASC months prior to that '6 days of awesomeness'.

If I keep listening, am I ever gonna get it back?, will it be permanent if I listen long enough?

I have also remarqued that Shannon's subs work really well the first week, and then result decrease quickly and then after some time you have sparks of result.

On DMSI first week had 2 new crazy lays and lot of IOI and after 3 months of use I did not even have half the attention of the first week, on a daily basis.

Also I took back MLS 1 week ago and during all the week my cognitive ability were greatly improved, and I also had some great discussion with people which made me rethink and see some subject with a new angle and I know it's a discussion that happened because of the sub.
But now I'm on week 2 and I already feel the decrease of the power.

Maybe the subconscious is just lazy as **** and is having a hard time maintening the execution of instructions.

Edit : Just saw Shannon's explanation, but my problem is even after 6 months of use for DMSI 3.1 for exemple I did not have better results than the 2 firsts weeks.

Is it possible that the sub consuis mind builds a resistance to the sub ? Hence it failing to work after 2 weeks ?

I have also noticed this phenomenon on many many occasions over the years here.

Those for whom the subs work and who remain here to post about it seem to have a good initial time and then reduce in effects.

I think Shannon addressed this some weeks/months ago that what seems to happen is that the subC sees the success and builds resistance to this, as it fears the change.

In all honesty im unsure so Shannon will clarify but if this is the case then it seems that there may be 3 types of resistance for Shannon to fight against:

A) The resistance that causes us to either NOT execute at all known as stonewalling.

B) The resistance that causes us to execute only some but not all of the sub.

C) The resistance that when you are executing the sub kicks in later and causes you to regress back to the initial state, as if the sub was never even bought.

Seems we have a long way to go yet guys.

I do know however that Shannon said somewhere in the past that there are like (im going to paraphrase) 100s and 100s of tech or script or something he still hasnt added to DMSI and wont even get round to adding it in 3.3.

I therefore suggest to all, that wouldnt it be better that we give Shannon the time to put in as much as he can and obviously wants to (since he needs to then track the data and assess the competence of said tech and sub) rather than pushing him to release the next version?

I always feel that there is that initial euphoria when we all wait for the latest DMSI in the hope to help us execute at the start only to be then dismayed, causing us to wait for the next version lol

So I say im happy to wait as long as it needs for Shannon to knock our socks off with 3.3

A lot of the problem you guys have is that you build up each release with unrealistic expectations and then when your expectations do not match reality, you feel disappointed and blame the sub. I was surprised to hear some of you say that 3.2 was "hyped" because I specifically made efforts to avoid hype with it, since you guys blamed me for this previously. It isn't my fault if I am trying not to build expectations, and you guys go all pie in the sky anyway. You have to approach each release from the point of view of, "I don't know what this will do, so I will approach it from a neutral standpoint and let it show me what it does."

You guys are so addicted to anything new and different that you work yourselves up into a tizzy regardless of what I say or do. Maybe with 3.3, I should just do everything in secrecy and just drop it on you out of nowhere.