05-13-2018, 08:38 AM
(05-13-2018, 03:53 AM)Shannon Wrote:(05-12-2018, 12:46 PM)anansi26 Wrote: Shannon,
Would you ever consider ditching the aura part of DMSI and just focus on everything else that would get us laid?
You do realize that the key element of DMSI achieving it's goals, has been by design, since day one, the aura, right? If it wouldn't take me days of work I know would be wasted, I would build a "c" without it and show you how preposterous the results would be.
I realize that the majority of us are using DMSI so we can have a lot of sex with one or more partners we wouldn't be able to get under normal conditions.I realize that you've put everything and the kitchen sink in this thing with mediocre results.I realize that your "models" have yet to deliver.I realize that you're a sublimal guru but it wouldn't hurt to try going about things a little differently and instead of replying "its resistance" to the negative feedback actually making real changes to the program.The reason why people are so exhausted is because theres too much shit in DMSI.We needed a house you built a backwards city.Remarkable but unneccessary.Make it gender specific ,add social skills and social proof,beef up pheromones and manifestation,instead of a morphine drip add something that makes us just feel awesome all the time and the people around us too.The very first version of DMSI had a great aura but it lacked the support needed for most to do anything with it.Then put a $300 price tag out the gate(no free upgrade)if it works raise price to $400.If it really works $500.Make one with aura one without aura.It would be preposterous(ly good)
