09-10-2017, 11:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2017, 11:39 AM by SargeMaximus.)
(09-10-2017, 10:59 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(09-10-2017, 10:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(09-10-2017, 09:38 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: I'm of the opinion that at least the DMSI threads should be allowed to delete as they serve Shannon for the development of 6G and the more detailed the better. And I know, you can edit the posts but there are still quotes. And a bunch of empty posts don't make sense anyway if you edit them.
I agree.
My intent was to detail as much as possible then delete the journals periodically for privacy. Not sure how Shannon expects to get detailed honest feedback now.
@RT: Thanks. Glad it resonated. I take it you looked up the book as soon as you read the quote? lol. Yeah it's good so far. My real interest in it is if it can provide a means to be civil without being taken advantage of.
An age-old pattern of mine.
It's certainly a balancing act, to learn to be civil while being able to set healthy boundaries, and yet remain honest. My MIL holds being "kind" and "civil" above all else, which is fundamentally flawed, because a person like that is inherently deceptive. How can you trust anything a person like that does or says?
Not only that but it's hazardous to your health as mentioned on page 115.
Healthy boundaries are definitely a difficult one.
Many people set boundaries, few set healthy boundaries.
For example, perhaps someone sets a boundary but by enforcing it they hit someone for a simple verbal slight.
Or sometimes people have boundaries that extend to other people i.e. "You shouldn't feel bad when I behave thusly" when really everyone is entitled to their feelings.
