08-27-2017, 01:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2017, 01:17 PM by Bookstacks DC737.)
Oh snap, I was right!
What I can surmise from these two aspects is the one resisting is a particularly hurt and disassociated part of myself.
It's unwilling or unable to understand that the emotions it feels aren't outside of itself, but internally generated. At some point I concluded that I had no agency over what I felt.
The other part seems to be a more mature version of me, the result of all my years of subliminal usage. My results didn't go away, they kept collectively building, but that old part of me wouldn't allow them to 100% execute.
Perhaps taking on this subliminal programming would mean it would have to take on responsibility for what it felt? Or it would threaten my safety?
Not certain, but there's a deep conflict going on there that 3.2 has been able to overcome.
For 3.2 I'd like to make a suggestion for an affected-side "responsibility" programming. From what I've seen, women are not taking responsibility for the way they feel while we're on the program, they attribute what they feel to us. I believe if women felt that "I'm really attracted to him!" rather than "He's really attractive!" they'd be more likely to act on the programming.
I'm not sure if that makes sense, but it's what my intuition is telling me is correct.
What I can surmise from these two aspects is the one resisting is a particularly hurt and disassociated part of myself.
It's unwilling or unable to understand that the emotions it feels aren't outside of itself, but internally generated. At some point I concluded that I had no agency over what I felt.
The other part seems to be a more mature version of me, the result of all my years of subliminal usage. My results didn't go away, they kept collectively building, but that old part of me wouldn't allow them to 100% execute.
Perhaps taking on this subliminal programming would mean it would have to take on responsibility for what it felt? Or it would threaten my safety?
Not certain, but there's a deep conflict going on there that 3.2 has been able to overcome.
For 3.2 I'd like to make a suggestion for an affected-side "responsibility" programming. From what I've seen, women are not taking responsibility for the way they feel while we're on the program, they attribute what they feel to us. I believe if women felt that "I'm really attracted to him!" rather than "He's really attractive!" they'd be more likely to act on the programming.
I'm not sure if that makes sense, but it's what my intuition is telling me is correct.
