Overblown Hyperbole - DMSI V3.1-A

[myth]

And then, I wonder how any difference is made up as since the physical doesn't change on this program, I am still confused as to what the program actually does to make someone attractive.

It enhances your current attractiveness by making suggestions that will help you to be perceived as more attractive, trusting that your subconscious (and its lifetime of observations) knows more than your conscious does about such things. Which posture, which movement, which actions, which thoughts, which words, which clothes, which hair-cut, which locations, etc. You make millions of decisions per day, and many decisions have more-sexy/less-sexy options. You can easily ignore auras and metaphysics, as long as you believe in decisions.

I know women aren't as bothered by a man's looks as we are by theirs (Apparently? But I've seen women act VERY thirsty over "hot" guys often so I have real doubts and think they like hot guys just like we like hot girls at the same intensity), but still if we are still "us" physically and facially etc., besides any internal things, I'm just not sure how it makes women around us become suddenly sexually attracted now and approach us for sex.

You seem to be supposing that it will suddenly create attraction where none exists. As I understand it, it's only enhancing it where it does exist/is predisposed. As a concrete example, when words/body language tell an interested woman that a hair flip or a smile is only a start, she becomes more obvious in her approaches. And there's also a big difference in being approached out of attraction and being approached for sex, not that the first can't lead to the second.

As Shannon has mentioned before, part of the problem here is, to be brutally honest, that such a scenario, an attractive woman I know and am already attracted to, aggressively approaching me to have sex is about the furthest thing from my current reality as can be now, so it's very hard to imagine it's even possible.

Because it's not about who you want to approach you. It's about who wants to approach you. AFAIK, DMSI is about making you more approachable to those that might choose to approach you, not about putting disinterested women under a magic sex spell. Unless I'm mistaken, the sniper's a focus tool/landing lights, not a human remote control.

Furthermore, I don't understand how the program knows my "type", and reaches out to them around me, and makes them become attracted to me, and then approach me for sex.

As I understand it, it doesn't do any of that. You know your type. The program doesn't. I presume that it merely suggests focusing your attraction efforts based on your personal priorities. I don't think that it "reaches out" or "makes them become attracted" so much as it suggests that you, sub-verbally or verbally or in whatever way necessary (across distance where possible), encourage them to make any existing attraction known/obvious. If they have no attraction for you, well... that's their free will, which Shannon has said that he won't subvert.

With the huge knowledge void there, I do tend to find it hard it can do anything for me.

I don't think that it's a knowledge void so much as it might be misunderstood expectation. You seem to want DMSI to let you choose your partner unilaterally, but DMSI is about getting others to act more on their feelings for you, not less. It's seeming like you spend a lot of time disbelieving that DMSI will do X (because you really want it to do X) when it seems designed to do Y. But I could be wrong.