(03-22-2017, 11:31 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(03-21-2017, 11:00 PM)Ricardo Wrote:(03-21-2017, 02:11 PM)CatMan Wrote: Day 21: DMSI V3.1-A
-let's face it, if Susan Boyle used DAOSI or DMSI, nobody would mistake her for Jessica Alba.
This is what DMSI is supposed to do! I sometimes wonder if we or Shannon realise this?
Shannon never promised any such thing. He said it would maximize your sexual irresistibility. The word itself suggests that there's some kind of limit. Like, if you ain't got no arms, many people are going to be turned off by that, aura be damned.
However, with all the tech in DMSI, I wouldn't be surprised if you could jump a whole 3 points on the "attractiveness" scale. From a 5 to an 8.
But you still gotta have arms, man.
The counter argument is usually as Chaos said.. which is nothing more than dumbing down the goals of DMSI. The limitation is what you are willing to do in response to their interest and efforts to initiate and have sex with you. Also the sales pitch says "Regardless of what you happen to be doing, wearing, look like, etc. etc."