02-01-2017, 07:53 PM
(02-01-2017, 06:07 PM)myth Wrote:(02-01-2017, 11:49 AM)robstar Wrote: If you read the post you quoted, you'll notice that he said "align to your preferred polarity as much as is needed for maximum sexual irresisitbility". Ergo, if your subconscious doesn't think you need to be more masculine you wont be and others can become as masculine or feminine as they wish. Everybody wins, no need to mess with anyone's mojo.
He did. And I'd read it. But I'd taken it as aligning to the pole (at the pole) "as much as is needed" rather than moving toward the pole (not yet at the pole) "as much as is needed", as silly as these subtle distinctions probably sound.
I certainly see your point. I'd just initially read it as being stuck with either one pole or the other (with me somehow overlooking the no-pole option, I'll admit), while you seem to have read it as something more like N% of the way to the preferred pole. Which sounds like the much less extreme interpretation.
Either way if the statement was worded incorrectly Shannon knows how to implement those statements to avoid people changing in ways they don't want to.
Turning super saiyan.