Drowning in pussy - A DMSI journal (v3 -> page 2, post 40)

[Shannon]

Shannon also said that 2 loops are the best option for the majority of people.
If you feel something different is right for you, it's ok. There is no truth and Shannon cannot feel what you are feeling. But since you are not feeling anything, maybe try 2 loops for a few days and see if anything changes. Or just go on.
Whatever you do, good luck and keep on drowning in pussy!

Yeah, because that's how we extract valid data from a herd of cats.

Shannon said that for A you are to do 3 loops a day, back to back, no exceptions, and for B you are to do 2 loops a day, no exceptions.

But hey, there's no truth, just feels, so just head on over to Random.org and fire up that generator. Might as well pick a number from 1 to 1000 and do that many loops a day, right? It felt right, so it's "my truth".

Got news for you guys. Feels right doesn't give me consistent data. I need consistent data. It's like herding cats in the first place, and trying to get consistent data out of you all is almost impossible. But without it, I basically have nothing to go on but my models.

It's not about "my truth", it's about making the experiment as consistent as possible so I can extract valid testing data from it. How am I supposed to advance this stuff without valid, consistent real world data? It's also about getting the best possible results so I know how far I gave actually come. You get the best results where I tell you to go.

FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME... FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS!

Hey Shannon, ever thought about developing a sort of program or set of tasks that the DMSI users could do and report on? Might help you get consistent data.

They're called instructions. And the program is DMSI.