12-03-2016, 12:46 PM
(12-03-2016, 12:37 PM)yeah! Wrote:(12-03-2016, 12:47 AM)Shannon Wrote: Much to my shock and surprise, however, the models repeatedly and consistently have shown me that it is not running BAMM 2.0 that best leads to my financial goals in the long term, but running DMSI 3.0.1-A. I do not (yet) understand this, but I do know that when the models give the same exact answer 26 times in a row... it is 99.999999999999999% likely to be correct.
But BAMM would have played a massive part in the creation of DMSI and so it is (probably along with all the other foundational script) still responsible. Maybe all that BAMM foundation, combined with the newer optimus engine is whats at work.
Exactly, I've said before that BAMM probably helped create 6G to begin with. It's really a matter of time now for it's design goal to be achieved. I have zero doubt in my mind that full 6G and all the programs you create with it will make you an appreciated, and rich man, thus fulfilling BAMM's design goal.
