Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

Shannon, when you have the time, can you explain exactly why outliers was faulty logic? This is a forum about life and progress after all, I'd like the conversations to be more cantered around that.

No, I can't. To do that I would have to pull up the book, and read it again... take notes... and write a chapter response explaining the faulty logic for each chapter's faulty logic.

In essence, I don't have a couple months or the energy to write a book pointing out the faulty logic in the book. It is a very complex set of arguments for it's points, and to really debate them would require an equally thorough explanation and counter-argument.

To sum up what I would say, in as few words as possible, though:

His arguments are faulty because they ignore, do not even consider or misinterpret and/or misunderstand a variety of variables. His arguments are also faulty because of logical fallacies, which would require the aforementioned book to be written to point out.

Also I have a question about sub listening: let's say I'm playing 2 subs, sub A and sub B, if I listen to sub A for 6 hours, and then listen to sub B for 8 hours, which sub is going to be ingrained and executed first? Should I switch them around depending on which ones more important?

There are far too many variables unaccounted for in that question for me to be able to answer.

Also, I remember you once mentioned that fear of failure had some sort of significance when it came to cognition or emotion, if you remember that concept, what was it? I'd like to know more about it.

I'm afraid I would need more information, as I don't really follow you here.