Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

I'm strongly opposed to this, and I'm pretty sure Shannon will never add such a thing. It would basically prevent you from ever getting the highest quality women, because broken women go for broken men. Next to that, it would be another way your subconscious prevents dealing with any issues one may have directly. It's the subconscious way of saying "I can remain broken and can still get women, so I don't have to deal with the issues". It's a very high price to pay for validation.

Don't worry, he's probably trolling just like his suggestion in the other thread.

Shannon definately knows better than to add dumb suggestions like those.

" He" is not trolling.

"He" may have aspergers and if that's the case, "he" may have to be sexless his entire life because of some stupid miscommunication issue that "he" has no control over.

I also don't appreciate being assumed I'm a troll CO stantly when I have real concerns. That's just ignorant and disrespectful.

Furthermore, if Shannon isn't willing to make the sub work with a person's flaw (my reason for making the suggestion) then perhaps he should step up the socializing aspect of his subs, because after however many years I've been doing them I have nothing to show for it yet in that area.

Clearly something is missing in the programs.

Sarge, "he" is RisingSon. And RisingSon very likely doesn't have Asperger's. I think you're thinking this was directed as you being the referenced person, but it's RisingSon.

And Sarge, blaming the program is only going to give you an excuse not to try. While it is my responsibility to figure out the instruction set that works, you also have to be willing to execute it and try outside that as well.