Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

"A" stands for "aura," which is the energetic field responsible for communicating a lot of information to other people, so I assume he's tuning the aura programming. Still an aura non-believer?

You misunderstood me, maybe reading too far into my words too.

All I wanted to know is why he is using the AOSI term again. That confused me, and with talks of him making spin-off programs I wanted to understand this.

I'm not sure I did, but whatever you say, dude. Seems Shannon's response was inline with my own - the last part, well, that's something I added, as I remember you saying as much in the past. But whatevs!

I don't understand your hostility to me on something so small and irrelevant. You must be reading into it, because it was a simple question about a name, that's it. Period.

A simple question about a name. That's all it was.

I asked why this "AOSI tuning" term was used in Shannon's journal, I thought it was called DMSI now. I just wanted to see why and if it meant another branch off program like what he's posted about in another thread for DMRI and DMSRI...talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill. That was a new term to me "AOSI tuning". It had nothing to do with my views on "auras" from awhile back that you brought up. It was a simple question about the NAME, not some debate.

No reason for snark thrown at me twice today for zero reason.

I guess this is one of those times text comes across so different than normal or something. It was LITERALLY a simple question about a name.

A simple question about a name.

That's it, that's all. It wasn't some dig, or a troll, or some nonsense. It was a simple obvious normal question about differing names that I wanted clarified, that was completely normal to ask.

I hope it's clear now.

There was no hostility, and then you "called me out," for whatever reason - like it was my misunderstanding, rather your apparent inability to make yourself clear the first time. Then you go and tell me I'm reading into things, twice.

So it was a simple question, and I provided a simple answer. In my opinion, there was no snarkiness or hostility - perhaps you were "reading into it."

I've had a bad day, and maybe you're getting an unfair shake by me, but your original reply pissed me off, plain and simple.

Are we clear? Clear as mud.

PS - If you have another bone to pick with me, PM me.

Gentlemen, how about we just take the high road and put this down as a miscommunication and drop it.