Shannon's Journal Discussion

[CatMan]

7. I'm a bit confused by this recent use of the AOSI term in your posts when the program was renamed DMSI awhile ago. I was just surprised to see that name again and didn't understand what was going on, even the term "AOSI tuning" I'm not familiar with.

"A" stands for "aura," which is the energetic field responsible for communicating a lot of information to other people, so I assume he's tuning the aura programming. Still an aura non-believer?

You misunderstood me, maybe reading too far into my words too.

All I wanted to know is why he is using the AOSI term again. That confused me, and with talks of him making spin-off programs I wanted to understand this.

I'm not sure I did, but whatever you say, dude. Seems Shannon's response was inline with my own - the last part, well, that's something I added, as I remember you saying as much in the past. But whatevs!

You must be reading into it, because it was a simple question about a name, that's it.

I asked why this "AOSI tuning" term was used in Shannon's journal, I thought it was called DMSI now. I just wanted to see why and if it meant another branch off program like what he's posted about in another thread for DMRI and DMSRI. That was a new term to me "AOSI tuning". It had nothing to do with my views on "auras" from awhile back that you brought up. It was a simple question about the NAME.

I guess this is one of those times text comes across so different than normal or something. It was LITERALLY a simple question about a name.

That's it, that's all. It wasn't some dig, or a troll, or some nonsense. It was a simple obvious normal question about differing names that I wanted clarified, that was completely normal to ask.

I hope it's clear now. I meant NOTHING by it, I asked about the name, that's it, pal.