Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

What you're saying is that women (and men probably are too) are in large part irrational when it comes to sex.

Exactly. Haven't there been allegations in history that a man's choice of sexual partners led to the downfall of his empire? Not logical at all.

Also, what about an effect in v3.x about "those affected feel concerned/worried that the user may not want to have sex with them and/or not have sex with them". I realize you might not want to use worried or nervous, but I don't know how else to convey that particular concept of both moving towards sex with the user (excited anticipation about having sex with the user AND relief when they finally do have sex with the user, and please the user) and away from not having sex with the user because I think both to and away from are necessary. Also perhaps this could be a recursive loop that builds as time passes when not having sex with the user.

It's better to avoid negative programming. I have this taken care of with emphasis on the rarity and difficulty of finding someone else like the user in the "superior choice" part of the script.

Recursion is very dangerous to get wrong or use incorrectly, and it's not really what you want here. You want reiteration, which allows the emphasis to continue building without potentially causing safety issues - and reiteration is already built in.