(10-09-2016, 01:05 PM)Duke.Togo Wrote:(10-09-2016, 12:48 PM)CatMan Wrote:(10-09-2016, 12:42 PM)Duke.Togo Wrote: Well he did say women have been more aggressively pursuing him and he landed his first girlfriend in 4 years. I'd say that was pretty good. I wish I had a link to his forum posting; I need to dig it out.
Now, while that may not be exactly the same as what you and I are looking for, it suited what he wanted. That can't be ignored.
I don't mean to ignore it at all, don't get me wrong.
I haven't seen that post.
I'm just saying one person getting something on a program proves he may be satisfied, that's great. But when it isn't the end goal of the program, while it IS great, and almost everybody else struggled to see end goal results, I don't know what the benefit is returning to that a second time. It seemed crystal clear clearing was needed to advance. Maybe a longer run on V2.4 will prove to give valuable data, for like 64 days, or until November 1st and then switch to V3.0.1. That could show something unique, as we have yet to run a working aura/clearing version for awhile, due to V2.2 having a script error negating the aura effects. So we aren't sure yet what's possible for a longer term aura/clearing version.
Well, the idea of running the program for a while could also be used as an argument for 2.3. I don't know what the longest anyone ran 2.3 for was, but I don't think anyone ran it for 32 days.
We've had a full month on 2.4, (actually for me it's going on 35 days now), and while the healing has been fun, I would be curious to give DMSI a full run through without the healing. It was my goal to go back to 2.3 after 45 days if I still didn't see results.
I wouldn't mind testing 2.5 - and I only say this because I don't think Shannon knows how long it will be before he will have a chance to build 3.0.
I would only suggest a 2.5 if it doesn't require a lot of time and effort for Shannon to create a build for it. If it's another week or two long project, I agree, I think it would be better served for him and everyone here if he continued to build 3.0.1.
I understand what you're saying, but if people have fears etc. that aren't being dealt with by using V2.5 with no healing, then they aren't likely to suddenly overcome the fears to take action out of nowhere. They can run such a program for months and months, but without dealing with the underlying problems causing the lack of results like fear etc., they aren't likely to get any real benefit aside from placebo or confirmation bias. Just seems like a waste of time if no healing is the only change, even if it isn't and he adds a few things, the benefit still seems very questionable to give up healing in exchange.
We'll see what he says and does, but I hope he ultimately decides to concentrate on V3 being the best program it can be instead and we get that end of this month or early November at the latest as that's starting to drag on now a bit. Rather than another no healing module program.
