10-09-2016, 12:28 PM
(10-09-2016, 12:22 PM)CatMan Wrote:(10-09-2016, 12:16 PM)Weichi Wrote:(10-09-2016, 11:45 AM)CatMan Wrote: It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though.
Unless those modules don't short circuiting and Shannon want to check that.
Then V2.3 would've been a step forward in results, but it wasn't. So it seems the test was already done and feedback showed they weren't in the way. And the reason V2.2 failed was because of a discovered script error, not the healing modules. They were red herrings. So I just feel this test would be redundant, and am hesitant to go off the healing benefits of V2.4 due to that is all.
There are two points which would make 2.5 interesting. First, the advanced technology in comparison to 2.3, which might help with reaching the goal even with some things to clear left. Second, most users did run 2.4 for about a month (and more than a month until release). So this could have been enough healing for some to see at least some kind of results.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.
