10-04-2016, 02:32 PM
(10-04-2016, 01:57 PM)Blink Wrote:(10-04-2016, 12:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3.
It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work...
Yea this didn't make sense to meHow can you make an optimal value higher, yet have the end result be more powerful and effective? Wouldn't that mean that it wasn't optimal to begin with?
Any example that's more concrete than that? Or would that give away too much?
Two words for you. This is all I can say.
Reality bending.
Beyond that you'll just have to trust me on this...
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
