Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.

I have had very limited opportunity to have female testers for DMSI. Only my girlfriend and one other. The other tested a couple times back in 2.1/2.2 only. GF consistently reports that DMSI is a very effective aphrodisiac whenever I expose her, but I am more than a little reluctant to expose her because of what it's designed to do. She definitely becomes more sexually aroused, interested, aggressive and initiates more after exposure, which is interesting given how highly sexual and initiatory she is to begin with. But, I don't want to give the advice to use DMSI as an aphrodisiac yet because I am not done determining what the safety effects are. Have to go slowly and carefully with that.

So would you say the demand for such a sub by women is minimal? Therefore making it more suitable, specifically, for men looking to attract women? Or maybe keep it generalized in " attracting members of the gender I am attracted to" but limiting it's usability by men?

I wonder if that would allow you to use script for goals that are specifically oriented for males, which would make the end product more effective. Considering the huge divide between male and female interest in the program (I don't think any women have expressed interest) it may be best to make it male specific.

So far, demand for this sub by women would seem to be limited, at best. This seems to be because they don't need it. In fact all but one have expressed a complete lack of interest or even fear of it (the ones who feared it were afraid of rape). After all, the offer of sex from a woman is usually enough to get her sex.

But you guys keep making the mistake of thinking that by cutting out women, I could somehow make it "more suitable, specifically, for men looking to attract women". It would not. I can work in gender-unspecified ways without reducing the power and effectiveness, with the exception being references to specific sex organs, which is unnecessary in this case.

You also are forgetting that this program is designed for six different markets at once. (gay, straight, bi) x (male, female). Doing it any other way would have me building more than one version, which I am not willing to do. This thing is insane enough to work with already.

But also, you don't realize what you would be giving up by making it even just male specific. There are potential alternate uses which I am exploring, based on that universality.

Don't worry. I know what I'm doing. We just have a very tall mountain here to conquer.