Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I'm certainly working on it. You guys who have the most trouble seem to give me the most ideas. Frustrating, but effective.

I think this will come about when I finish implementing P4, make the energy sourcing right for fully powering the program in real time, and adjust a few other things.