08-21-2016, 03:17 PM
Ricardo, you amaze me consistently. Why on earth would I be "having a laugh with you this way" when I stand to lose a lot if this program cannot be made to work correctly? We don't have time for me to play practical jokes, and I wouldn't do that regardless because I need trust from all of you to succeed.
The goal phrasing is not a joke.
But today at lunch, I had a woman easily 20 years my senior hitting on me at the bar - I was having lunch there, and had just finished a loop of DMSI 2.3. I think I also had a server responding too, she had a very womanly figure, especially her big ol butt, nicely proportioned, although relatively average in the face. She seemed to be doing things that only made sense if she was attracted, like hovering near me, always facing away from me, finding excuses to bend over in my direction, cleaning tables near me that clearly did not need cleaning, etc.
The fact is, I cannot (yet) prevent women who fall outside the goal phrasing from responding. That effort is going into 3.0, and may not even work there.
And Ricardo, being only able to get older women when you're older yourself? That's a limiting belief. I'm 43 now, and I get hit on by girls who aren't even 18 yet, just as often as I get hit on by women of all the other age ranges. I even get responses from women in their 70's, 80s and 90s occasionally. It's all about figuring out how you are limiting yourself, and then removing those limits. Before I did that, I never got interest from any woman who wasn't within 13 years of my age in either direction, and almost always it was older than me. Now, I get interest from women of all ages because I don't presume that "nobody of that age could find me attractive". Now, I presume I am universally attractive, and they respond as such - because I am not limiting myself And in not limiting myself, when they come to me asking how they should view me and respond (which is what everyone does by default at a subconscious level when they encounter someone else), I am telling them basically, "respond to me as if I am all that, because I believe it and you should too".
The goal phrasing is not a joke.
But today at lunch, I had a woman easily 20 years my senior hitting on me at the bar - I was having lunch there, and had just finished a loop of DMSI 2.3. I think I also had a server responding too, she had a very womanly figure, especially her big ol butt, nicely proportioned, although relatively average in the face. She seemed to be doing things that only made sense if she was attracted, like hovering near me, always facing away from me, finding excuses to bend over in my direction, cleaning tables near me that clearly did not need cleaning, etc.
The fact is, I cannot (yet) prevent women who fall outside the goal phrasing from responding. That effort is going into 3.0, and may not even work there.
And Ricardo, being only able to get older women when you're older yourself? That's a limiting belief. I'm 43 now, and I get hit on by girls who aren't even 18 yet, just as often as I get hit on by women of all the other age ranges. I even get responses from women in their 70's, 80s and 90s occasionally. It's all about figuring out how you are limiting yourself, and then removing those limits. Before I did that, I never got interest from any woman who wasn't within 13 years of my age in either direction, and almost always it was older than me. Now, I get interest from women of all ages because I don't presume that "nobody of that age could find me attractive". Now, I presume I am universally attractive, and they respond as such - because I am not limiting myself And in not limiting myself, when they come to me asking how they should view me and respond (which is what everyone does by default at a subconscious level when they encounter someone else), I am telling them basically, "respond to me as if I am all that, because I believe it and you should too".
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
