Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

Unfortunately, v3 is a shift in both goal phrasing and energy sourcing (compared to v1). Maybe if it under performs, we get a version that uses v1's goal phrasing and keeps the improved energy sourcing. We'll just have to wait and see.

I know you're using E2. You didn't experience each version of DMSI as I did. V1's goal phrasing was the same (or very similar) to BIABWS. It was hit or miss, but the aura was very apparent. And it always seemed to affect older women the most. I affected more women I found attractive on 2.1, and 2.2 would have been amazing if the aura didn't have a conflict in the scripting. Don't glorify V1 when you didn't run it - it wasn't that great.

Sorry, Boss -- v1 was balls to the wall kickass (at least for me). I would pay $299 - $500 for this:

A two subliminal set.

Stage One: Focused on healing. It's a version of E2 directly aimed at achieving the target goal. Heals in the background like E2. Heals you at your own pace. Hides the pain from the conscious mind. Intuitively lets you know when you're ready for Stage 2.

Stage Two: v1's aura + upgraded NSFM (not "Natural Seduction for EVERYONE," as Shannon put it) that puts me in a fierce, hunting mode + the state-shifting and autopilot.

Why not NSFE, chaos? Well, this is pure speculation, but I think the gender neutral thing is holding DMSI back. A lot of people get annoyed when they hear "gender neutral" because they think of all the craziness in the news. When I hear "gender neutral," at least in regards to DMSI, I think of it from the perspective of a businessman: Shannon doesn't want to have to develop, maintain and support multiple SKUs. Solution? Make a turnkey, all-in-one version.

It's not holding anything back. The only difference between gender unspecified and gender specified in the script would be that it would limit the ways DMSI can be used, and it would allow me to be more specific about what kind of sex than it is now.

Here's my issue -- and again, this is PURE speculation, so I may be completely off-base. Men and women have distinct (and almost opposing) sexual strategies. If I had to guess, the autopilot and state-shifting technologies are evolved versions of the tech in NSFM. I imagine those functions work by instructing the subconscious to provide the proper knowledge to the conscious mind to achieve the target goal. However, I bet NSFM also contained direct instructions on seducing women, based upon Shannon's research in human sexuality. In simpler terms, a man that HAD no knowledge of seduction would receive some from the subliminal -- ala Sex Magnet -- which would contribute to his success.

The autopilot and state-shifting technologies are not evolved versions of the tech in NSFM. NSFM also did not contain direct instructions on seducing women

Theoretically, a "Natural Seduction for Everyone," would lack these extra instructions and would rely completely on the autopilot and state-shifting tech. As we've seen with v2.1 and v2.2, the autopilot tech doesn't seem to be kicking in for inexperienced men -- hence the whole, "I don't know what to do with these IOIs" issue.

Autopilot doesn't kick in for inexperienced men because it requires that there be a certain level of fear of the goal or less for the conscious mind to relax enough to allow it to kick in. Inexperienced men naturally have more fear because of their inexperience, and therefore are preventing their own success thereby.

In my opinion, the best way to reach the target goal is separating the subs into multiple SKUs. Think about it -- most women are inundated with male attention anyway. It's not "more male attention" that they want, it's "more alpha male" attention. A SKU dedicated to women could possess that specific phrasing, making it a much more worthwhile investment for them.

It's much more likely that if I stop using the gender universal format, I will not produce anything for women at all, since women have shown next to zero interest in the program as far as I can tell. On the contrary, 90+% seem to be afraid of it.

That being said, we still have to remember that this is still the exploratory stage of brand new science. You can't expect Shannon to get it right the first time because there's no precedence for what's being done here. Most people still don't even believe it's possible. I was telling a good friend of mine about this and he was looking at me like I was absolutely crazy. Shannon mentioned in another thread that developing this correctly is probably harder than going to the moon. People disagreed. Think about it -- there's been a number of successful lunar landings. The powers that be KNOW how to do it. Yes, it's difficult, expensive and requires a HUGE staff. However, it's been done. Multiple times. There's a manual. There's no manual whatsoever to developing something like DMSI.

Bullseye.