I'm not a fan of the double blind testing either. I think a small minority -- who haven't even used DMSI (like Ben and 4Kingdoms pointed out) -- are drowning out the voices of those who actually want to contribute.
At this point, the only "negative" feedback I'd consider is CatMan because he's actually used DMSI and his feedback is constructive. I still think he's stonewalling the program or allowing his skepticism to cloud his vision. I think he said he's an ENTP -- they're a naturally argumentative, "solid in their views" type.
Not trying to be a jerkface, but... maybe Shannon should've made a private DMSI forum for verified testers only. No buy, no entry. Forces people to really invest in the program and not sling sh*t from the sidelines.
I'm totally down for the 2.4 healing though. I was actually starting to look forward to it. Was thinking about my results last night and it's GOTTA be the year of healing and self-development prompted by a year of AM6.
At this point, the only "negative" feedback I'd consider is CatMan because he's actually used DMSI and his feedback is constructive. I still think he's stonewalling the program or allowing his skepticism to cloud his vision. I think he said he's an ENTP -- they're a naturally argumentative, "solid in their views" type.
Not trying to be a jerkface, but... maybe Shannon should've made a private DMSI forum for verified testers only. No buy, no entry. Forces people to really invest in the program and not sling sh*t from the sidelines.
I'm totally down for the 2.4 healing though. I was actually starting to look forward to it. Was thinking about my results last night and it's GOTTA be the year of healing and self-development prompted by a year of AM6.
