08-16-2016, 05:33 PM
(08-16-2016, 05:24 PM)yeah! Wrote: The double blind (triple?) placebo control sounds awesome. Would the placebo give a reading on frequencee?
For this test to be double blind, I will have to make the audio files and have someone else label them as A, B and C for me to not know any more than you do which ones are what until after the experiment is concluded. That's what I would do if I do run the testing like that.
The placebo would for all intents and purposes be undetectable as such aside from actual effects produced by 2.3 that the other two do not produce. Otherwise there would be a way to defeat the double blind nature of the experiment.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!