Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

Does that require an initial understanding of what makes us sexy though? If I've never felt sexy or desirable before, does my subconscious actually know what to do? Can I educate myself somehow?

It already knows or has access to everything you need to know. Believe it.

hi Shannon,
i tried to search for SM 3.0 in the thread but the system found it too short!! of a term to search for.
i wanted to learn how this new DMSI relates to SM 3.0. i am in the fifth stage of AM 6 and starting the last stage 5 days later (the change is unbelievable, btw.).
i was thinking of purchasing the SM 3.0 set for afterwards, however this new program caught my attention, mostkly because of the new methods you are using in it. i was prepared to purchase the sm 3.0 so, without regards to the price, what should be the next step? is it possible to use DMSI 2.2 along with SM 3.0, maybe one or two loops a day (which the answer will probably be no, but i did not come across with a discussion of this in the 30+ pages i browsed)?
i hope i have not asked a question that was asked before, but did not find anything related in the last 30 or so pages i went back.

You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.

Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.

They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.

SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.

One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.

Which one you pick is up to you.

hi Shannon,
somewhere in this thread, you mentioned FLAC files in the newest programs are slightly more effective than compressed mp3s.
assuming you have the uncompressed masters, is it possible for you to encode the SM 3.0 program in FLAC format as well?
i am at the last stage of AM 6 and about to start that one soon. probably like most of us who are here and taking it seriously, i have the necessary audio setup, all wired hi-res player/headphones/speakers (for ultrasonics) that all support up to at least 35khz range.

please consider this request as i am really hoping it is a justifiable effort on your side. it would probably benefit everyone who have started with AM 6.0 and will be getting on SM 3.0 as their only program for another 6 stages, even a 5% more efficiency translates to around 200 hours of listening .

That is some seriously flawed logic.

5% increase in clarity of audio does not translate into more time listening. It translates into 5% more easy comprehension. So no effective "more time listening" result.

It is, however, not going to be a case where the return on investment of time and effort to make FLACs for the SM3 program is going to be worth the cost. Moving forward there will be FLAC. I can't go back and create new compressed versions and then test, verify, label, tag, upload, etc. if I am going to be productive in what I am currently swamped doing.