07-06-2016, 03:30 PM
[quote='kenpachi' pid='119363' dateline='1467792690']
Hey Shannon, I thought it was established that the legal age of consent limiter took away from the overall power of the program?[quote]
According to the models, that phrasing produces the results that make the majority of you very, very happy. So if it does limit the power, it does so in a way that produces much better results than otherwise, regardless.
[quote]For example, if I'm in a room and there's a multiple attractive women of legal age and one girl aged 15, as we're forced to stop attracting the 15 year old our sexual energy will have to be neutered and will therefore be less effective on the other attractive women of age in the room? [/quote]
With the phrasing I have discovered so far, what would happen is this.
In the room with the 15 year old girl and the legal age female, the legal age female would experience the full effects of the program as it is tuned to fully affect her. The subconscious reaches out to her with your energy and attunes it to affect her fully.
When the subconscious encounters the 15 year old girl, and we know she is underage, the subconscious disregards her and does not reach out to affect her. You are not "neutering" anything; it's a matter of intentionally affecting one, and not the other.
[quote]If that's not the case then my apologies, if it is then personally I would like to see it removed if it's going to lessen our POWAR. [/quote]
This is why the models say you guys don't really want what you think you want. It doesn't work nearly as well in it's results. You're worried about not enough power, when we have plenty of power because the power sources have been pretty well optimized at this point, so what we need is to affect the right subset of the population in the right way.
[quote]Also, as I haven't said it yet and have mostly just been giving you feedback/demands, I wanted to say thank you for your work on this, I really appreciate your effort and dedication to making this program the best it can be.
[/quote]
I appreciate that. Thank you.
Hey Shannon, I thought it was established that the legal age of consent limiter took away from the overall power of the program?[quote]
According to the models, that phrasing produces the results that make the majority of you very, very happy. So if it does limit the power, it does so in a way that produces much better results than otherwise, regardless.
[quote]For example, if I'm in a room and there's a multiple attractive women of legal age and one girl aged 15, as we're forced to stop attracting the 15 year old our sexual energy will have to be neutered and will therefore be less effective on the other attractive women of age in the room? [/quote]
With the phrasing I have discovered so far, what would happen is this.
In the room with the 15 year old girl and the legal age female, the legal age female would experience the full effects of the program as it is tuned to fully affect her. The subconscious reaches out to her with your energy and attunes it to affect her fully.
When the subconscious encounters the 15 year old girl, and we know she is underage, the subconscious disregards her and does not reach out to affect her. You are not "neutering" anything; it's a matter of intentionally affecting one, and not the other.
[quote]If that's not the case then my apologies, if it is then personally I would like to see it removed if it's going to lessen our POWAR. [/quote]
This is why the models say you guys don't really want what you think you want. It doesn't work nearly as well in it's results. You're worried about not enough power, when we have plenty of power because the power sources have been pretty well optimized at this point, so what we need is to affect the right subset of the population in the right way.
[quote]Also, as I haven't said it yet and have mostly just been giving you feedback/demands, I wanted to say thank you for your work on this, I really appreciate your effort and dedication to making this program the best it can be.
[/quote]
I appreciate that. Thank you.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
