07-04-2016, 02:30 PM
(07-04-2016, 02:22 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-04-2016, 02:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have been modeling a few options for the goal for V2.2 today and according to the models, the things you guys think you want, you don't really want. That means there's some unaccounted for variable that we haven't thought of that would throw it off, just like it has apparently thrown off V2.1's "people I am sexually attracted to" goal. I do have something that looks promising, though, and when I have more time I will continue looking for better goal phrasing.
Interesting Shannon. The question then is will you make a version that gives us what we think we want, or will you give us a version that gives us what we "really want".
I vote for the former, tbh.
I am going to produce whatever the models tell me will result in the overall most number of customers who are happy with the product.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!