05-28-2016, 10:07 PM
(05-28-2016, 08:20 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi, Shannon!
You've mentioned these tests you run, use a long term view to arrive at conclusions.
Most people run multis for 192 days, or single stages for usually much less time than that admittedly.
How long are your models going for to arrive at claims they could be dangerous, or that they work etc. and are good for sale? 384 days using a single stage? Maybe an hour number is what you use, say like 10,000 hours listened?
Just trying to line up what you feel is long term listening, in order to get the result desired in programs.
I am looking at the aggregated outcomes for how the program in question performs over the course of years at a time, for all of my customers as a whole.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!