05-26-2016, 11:11 PM
(05-26-2016, 11:08 PM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 06:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: Alright, so I just did a short run of the predictive models and the answer I get is interesting. The statements in the script of AOSI to prevent and repel undesired attention seem to affect both those who you want to be attracted, and those you don't. Basically, it reduces to a significant degree, the effects of the whole program.
Based on this, I think I am probably going to build it without those limiters. They do what they are intended to do, but the cost for achieving the program's goals is potentially too high. I'll do longer and more detailed runs, but unless they significantly disagree with this run and for good reasons, that's what's most likely.
So does the limiters in BIABW and SM3 also reduces to a significant degree, the effect of the whole program? Or all this is due to the gender neutral statement in the new AOSI?
It would have nothing to do with the user specified gender statements in AOSI, so I presume it is affecting the other two programs in a similar fashion.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!