03-18-2016, 11:08 AM
(03-18-2016, 10:15 AM)sushi521 Wrote:(03-18-2016, 09:50 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote:I am using TLAM so is TLAM not the way to gain millions ? Its ebeen 2 weeks(03-18-2016, 09:20 AM)ArcticFox Wrote:(03-18-2016, 08:18 AM)sushi521 Wrote:(03-18-2016, 07:59 AM)dissonance Wrote: That long? But I read that some lottery winners used visualization and intention techniques to win lottery in about 6 months.
source?
http://www.amazon.com/How-Win-Lottery-At...520&sr=1-1
The author himself manifested $50,000 in six months, because that's the number he selected. Then he won another 100k or something. Then there's interviews with others who won millions. The techniques are basically visualization and affirmations.
Theres a famous story in an Tony Robbins program, ina nutshell he told them if you believe it, believe its already happened/going to happen and tell people its real, your brain will think its real and it will happen.
They won a lot of money in the lottery!
When ive finished EPRHA i'm going to run manifest Luck for a month and apply some of these techniques and also enter at least x amounts of competitions a day - just to see what happens!
The author of the lottery book also suggested using subliminals to help build your belief and overcome the feeling of lack. That's also how I found out about subliminal and eventually this site. So I think TLAM definitely helps.
Personally I think if Shannon makes a lottery sub it will work. I mean the sub is supposed to be much more powerful than visualization and stuff. If you can manifest girlfriends and boyfriends, why not $1 million? Also, Shannon mentioned something about it requiring much more energy. But that depends on your belief and how you view money, doesn't it? If you think 1 million is a lot and you have to work really hard for years to get it, then it'll probably be difficult. But what if you truly believe it's only a piece of cake, something you can get all the time?
[/quote]
I cant visualize. I can't see an image in my mind. Does that make my visualization of none effect ?