Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

The sheet of paper I have sitting here on my desk with the list of subs I am olding in queue reads like this:

(In no particular order of development)

EHPRA 2.0
Overcoming Procrastination
Ultimate Writer
Luck Magnifier 5G
MUWAS 5G
Ultra Success 5G
AOS _ BIABWS 5G
Manifest Perfect GF/BF Stunningly Beatiful GF/BF
Manifest perfect wife/husband
manifest perfect soul mate
dream your best solution
General Pain Relief
Sleep Aid
Awakener
Stress Relief


I take it MUWAS stands for Manifest UNlimited,wealth,abundance and success ? or ? Manifest your perfect soul mate/husband looks awesome too.

Hi Shannon, I hope the updated Aura of Sexiness sub you make is gender neutral because it is of interest to some females too. Also im a lesbian female too, so the attracting men thing is of little use to me. I know it is predominantly men here, and even less LGBT. but i would appreciate it if you can make things as gender neutral whenever possible so I can use some subs too. Right now, still lot of subs on the list to do. and I'm starting with OGSF 5G. Finally jumped the gun and bought an IML sub. but will use it starting March because of other commitments. or if you can do it like this, "if you're a heterosexual man, or a lesbian woman, bla bla bla." or "if you're a heterosexual woman or a gay man", bla bla bla" . or if you're planning to do a AOS/BIABWS combo, you can have a standalone version of AOS for gender neutral people or people who only want the aura. thankfully, i have no interest in the magnets because i am strictly monogamous and have no desire to be with multiple women. but it is nice to be more attractive.

That's a good point. The only thing is, "if" statements, so far, have been challenging at best to get working. I'm making progress, but it seems to have trouble because the subconscious either perceives reality differently in some way we don't currently understand, or is dealing with factors we don't know about that require extraordinary wording to make effective.

I've concluded that it makes a lot of sense to try to make each program as universal as possible. So if it has to be for men, I'd try to make it work for all men. And so forth. And if it's not necessary to gender it, then make it work for all people. The reason for specificity beyond that is that it can be made more capable by being more specific, but it also sextuples the work load creating hetero, homo, bi, etc. for each gender. More chance for mistakes too. So I'll be focusing on making things as universal as possible, and now I actually have the knowledge to make that work as well as or better than the specified ones of the past.