10-10-2018, 12:50 PM
(10-10-2018, 07:41 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(10-09-2018, 05:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: The models are accurate in the vast majority of cases. However, what they show is the current most probable future, which is what happens in about 96% of cases with the exception of when someone responds to a forecast by intentionally acting to change to a different probability line, and thus future, in order to prevent the forecast from coming to pass - which in almost all cases is possible.
I was expecting this from you also.
Expecting what exactly?
...with the exception of when someone responds to a forecast by intentionally acting to change to a different probability line, and thus future, in order to prevent the forecast from coming to pass...
I expected that when I told you what would work, you would just change what you were doing to stop it from working anyway. Thus invalidating the results and achieving nothing. Again. As usual.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!