09-10-2018, 06:25 PM
(09-10-2018, 06:14 PM)Shannon Wrote:(09-10-2018, 06:03 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(09-10-2018, 05:36 PM)Shannon Wrote:(09-10-2018, 10:47 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(09-10-2018, 09:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: If I was to focus on it, it might very well be. But why would altering your genes make sense in DMSI? That is what we have to figure out before I start creating subs that are directly trying to achieve genetic manipulation. There has to be a very, VERY good reason to go that low level, and a very clearly defined and very specific goal to achieve.
Why would it not? Isn’t DMSI about sex? And isn’t sex basically about passing on good genes?
Altering your genes has to have one or more specific goals. What are these goals you think DMSI needs to alter genes to achieve?
Well first I guess we'd have to define what genes women (the human species?) want, and then proceed to alter our own to be that. It may be a can of worms and I don't even know if it's possible but, theoretically, if genes are what women are searching for, then making the genes "right" would solve every single problem.
It's an exciting prospect but again, I don't know where to begin or how possible it is.
Altering one's genes is completely unnecessary to achieve the goals of DMSI, as long as you are fully executing it, as far as I can tell. You can alter the perception of the affected much more safely, easily and effectively instead.
Fair enough.