Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Shadow2200]

Shannon,

First I would like to thank you for having the courage to set a goal such as DMSI. This program is amazing. It really helps me in a variety of ways in my life. And I can clearly see now why you implemented PTPA and Anxiety relief.

Thanks for your appreciation.

Few pages back, you said there are many factors that determine attractiveness and you have a list of 100 or so factors in your notes. You also mentioned that most of these factors are still not in DMSI.

Hopefully we going to get some of these factors in 3.3, yes?
What are some major factors of that list you looking to put in 3.3? Any examples? Something that is not currently in 3.2. Maybe some of us already experiencing these factors as a result of TID

I said that there are well over 100 tumblers to the "lock" of female sexuality. I don't remember exactly how many I have discovered so far, but it's something between 130 and 150. These are all the things that a woman will consider and take into account before allowing herself to, and choosing to have sex.

Those factors are for the most part not yet in DMSI. I'm not sure how much of that will make it into 3.3, but 3.3 will be focusing on upgrading the auric modulation and effects.

What they are is not something I care to share. It's taken me over 15 years of constant work to discover these, tease them out of endless experiments and data. I don't want to just give that away. But I will tell you this. There are a lot of things a woman takes into account and considers that would never in a million years cross a man's mind as to his own sexual choices and actions. This is the primary sticking point for most men: they have no idea what she's really thinking and basing her sexual choices and actions on.

Keep in mind that completely unlocking the sexuality of a woman is still not within my grasp. Even after more than 15 years of work, I still can't do it. Women are extremely complex creatures, and they have an entirely different set of tumblers to their "lock" than males do. It also depends on their sexual orientation, as it does with men. So it may be that I never discover how to completely unlock this, and even if I do, how would I implement it? I don't know yet. I'll be going as far as I can safely go with DMSI, but in the end, we have to move on sooner or later, even if I cannot fully unlock human sexuality.

I'm sure you've noted that we are making progress with each release, though, and that DMSI 3.2 has achieved design spec on a number of occasions. The biggest issues we have right now are resistance from the user, and resistance from the affected. I'd say the former is much more dangerous to the ultimate success of the program than the latter.

I'd have to say as for as my testing has gone it been more the latter resistance from the user has been the biggest hold back form this really taking off at this point

[Shannon]

I've been on LTU for a week. I'm looking at going to DMSI in about 2 weeks since I was on UD, and 21 days I'm supposed to be off any 5.5 subs. Need I be off all subs before starting DMSI, or is it just 5.5 subs that I need a break from?

It is necessary to take a break from all subs to be really effective. 3 and 4G subs you would only need a few days from. 5G, a week. And anything above that, 21 days is the minimum because of P5/P6. The exception would be EHPRA 2.0, which is the only 5.5G to not have P5 or P6 in it. That you should have a minimum 7 day break from.

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.

[ncbeareatingman]

35 days!? damn sam thats some POWER4FUL shit ! to say da least!
I betcha in the future it could be as much as 3 months or more between 'shifts',so to speak,or maybe no thing is needed as the new revelations-technology becomes so advanced that theres no need to have 'down time', but so far though.... talk about quantum jumps...geez!!

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.

I've been on LTU for a week. I'm looking at going to DMSI in about 2 weeks since I was on UD, and 21 days I'm supposed to be off any 5.5 subs. Need I be off all subs before starting DMSI, or is it just 5.5 subs that I need a break from?

It is necessary to take a break from all subs to be really effective. 3 and 4G subs you would only need a few days from. 5G, a week. And anything above that, 21 days is the minimum because of P5/P6. The exception would be EHPRA 2.0, which is the only 5.5G to not have P5 or P6 in it. That you should have a minimum 7 day break from.

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.

[Griffin]

Hey Shannon,

Is there a subliminal in the making for: overcome procrastination, ultimate self discipline, motivation, ultra succes?

this would make my life alot better i think.

cheers,

Griffin

[samba99]

Shannon,
Why have you suggested to Catman to do 7loops of DMSI? Is that one of initial options the models suggested?

[Shadow2200]

Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet

[findingme]

Shannon,

It appears you've put some AM pieces in DMSI, such as the IDGAF attitude, high value thinking, and killing procrastination.

Did you put the decisiveness piece in 3.2 or any previous version? I'm not stressing for it, but I fumbled in making quick decisions twice today with my ex-Marine very alpha boss, and I've been thinking on it. I'll be starting DMSI soon, and that would be an excellent add-on to look forward to.

[samba99]

Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet

No, 1 loop per day.

[Shadow2200]

Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet

No, 1 loop per day.

We need 8 loops to break through

[Oversoul]

Will the end product of DMSI be 6G or will it remain as 5.5G?

[samba99]

Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet

No, 1 loop per day.

We need 8 loops to break through

I have no idea why y’all think that way.
My best success ever with this sub is when I did 2 loops per day. Two days per week. When everyone was doing 3-4loops everyday.

[Shannon]

35 days!? damn sam thats some POWER4FUL shit ! to say da least!
I betcha in the future it could be as much as 3 months or more between 'shifts',so to speak,or maybe no thing is needed as the new revelations-technology becomes so advanced that theres no need to have 'down time', but so far though.... talk about quantum jumps...geez!!

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.

I've been on LTU for a week. I'm looking at going to DMSI in about 2 weeks since I was on UD, and 21 days I'm supposed to be off any 5.5 subs. Need I be off all subs before starting DMSI, or is it just 5.5 subs that I need a break from?

It is necessary to take a break from all subs to be really effective. 3 and 4G subs you would only need a few days from. 5G, a week. And anything above that, 21 days is the minimum because of P5/P6. The exception would be EHPRA 2.0, which is the only 5.5G to not have P5 or P6 in it. That you should have a minimum 7 day break from.

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.

P6 is fully optimized. It will be unlikely to go beyond 53 days, because it will be unlikely that I will ever need top adjust it again. Fortunately.

[Shannon]

Hey Shannon,

Is there a subliminal in the making for: overcome procrastination, ultimate self discipline, motivation, ultra succes?

this would make my life alot better i think.

cheers,

Griffin

I am currently swamped between the custom, the Disconnect From Negative Stress sub, dealing with my girlfriend and dealing with my family. I'd like to build Ultra Success and Ultra Motivation, but until things calm down on the female/family front, no dice. There is not enough time in a day right now.

[Shannon]

Shannon,
Why have you suggested to Catman to do 7loops of DMSI? Is that one of initial options the models suggested?

The models returned the value of 7 loops for CatMan to achieve significant success. The fact that he found an excuse to only do 1 loop tells me that he knows that would have worked, so he escaped in what way he could. Which really doesn't surprise me, since I predicted that some of you guys would do exactly that sort of thing in response to 3.2 and later, on this very forum, before releasing 3.2. I even told you guys that the excuses would end up being very logical, creative, well thought out and believable. But they are still excuses.