Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Shannon]

hi Shannon
wanted to ask you this question while DMSI is still fresh in your memory and before you move on to something else.
in the light of what the current DMSI is doing, how do you compare it to SM3.0 in terms of technology and the objectives that are achieved?
i am already halfway 4th stage of SM30 and want to ask

1. you had made the remark that DMSI and SM3.0 is almost opposite to eachother and SM3.0 would be a better choice for permanent evolution (so to say). are your thoughts still the same on this?
2. considering i have purchased DMSI and have access to the working version, would running DMSI after SM3.0 have any adverse effects, or running SM3.0 another round still a feasible option in the light of what is in DMSI?

Obviously, 3.0 is a much lower level of technology.

Objectives achieved... well, you have to read my previous posts and compare the product description pages.

1. I have to see what 3.x does before I can comment.

2. You could do either. I would say that you should finish SM and give it some time to show itself to you after it's done... and then decide what to do.

[Steven]

Shannon,

I have seen that the A files are 69 minutes and the B files are 72 minutes. I'm sure the A files are supposed to be 69 minutes, but are the B files 72 minutes?

[Shannon]

I would like to use the hybrid masked trickling stream track. Am a bit concerned since there is also the ultrasonic track in there. If I play it through in ear headphones, can I play it as loud as is comfortable for me or should I turn down the volume so that I can barely hear the track?

Normal calibration uses the audible tracks to calibrate the ultrasonic tracks.

We now have both in one track.

We know they are 1-2 dB louder because of additive effect, and because I did not compensate that out.

So... set the audible part of the hybrid to a comfortable level, and if you still think the ultrasonic is too loud, lower the volume until it's not. A click or two should be fine if it is needed.

[Shannon]

Shannon,

I have seen that the A files are 69 minutes and the B files are 72 minutes. I'm sure the A files are supposed to be 69 minutes, but are the B files 72 minutes?

Checking against the md5 hashes will tell you the answer you crave.

But yes, they use different ASRB ratios.

[KingDavid93]

Pretty sure it's not AP code, headache is starting to fade halfway through 2nd loop while the heat remains.

[dweller94]

2.4/2.5 links have disappeared and the new links for 3.0.1 are up, I am downloading as I write this to confirm!

[Benjamin]

3.0.1 links fixed.

[Shannon]

Pretty sure it's not AP code, headache is starting to fade halfway through 2nd loop while the heat remains.

Yeah, it would not be fading if it was AP code.

[CatMan]

Okay Shannon!

I'm seeing a 15db-20db difference over here through my Sennheisers with Frequensee. The ultrasonic is registering as 15-20db louder than the masked in the hybrid trickling stream, way more than 1-2 db. I wouldn't have bothered to post if the difference was so slight, I thought there was a problem in the track. Just got concerned about such a big variance, I'll continue on.

[Shannon]

3.0.1 links fixed.

Thanks Ben.

And all was blissful again in the land of honey and rainbows and DMSI.

[apollolux]

I was gonna suggest using WordPress's built-in rollback function to revert to a revision of the page that had the correct links, but Ben posted that he fixed it.

[Steven]

Checking against the md5 hashes will tell you the answer you crave.

But yes, they use different ASRB ratios.

I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.

[Broski]

3 loops of version A down. Nothing to report yet. Everything feels/seems to be per usual but i didnt really expect anything to happen internally or externally off the bat

[AbundanceCH]

Checking against the md5 hashes will tell you the answer you crave.

But yes, they use different ASRB ratios.

I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.

Same here. Maybe Shannon can put a sticky somewhere.