Shannon's Journal Discussion

[Blacksheep]

Can someone help a brother out and explain what this Hybrid track is? I have read through these pages and still do not understand.

Is it a mixture of Ultrasonic + Masked? Does this make it 2x as powerful?

[eternity]

Shannon, since there's no ASRB, does that mean we don't need to listen to the 3 loops back to back to back? Or has the technology evolved beyond that, to where we need all three loops in one session?

[AriGold]

Can someone help a brother out and explain what this Hybrid track is? I have read through these pages and still do not understand.

Is it a mixture of Ultrasonic + Masked? Does this make it 2x as powerful?

Yes it is a mixture of both. Makes it more powerful and demanding. Should get faster results. Be prepared to lift off.

[Duke.Togo]

Shannon, since there's no ASRB, does that mean we don't need to listen to the 3 loops back to back to back? Or has the technology evolved beyond that, to where we need all three loops in one session?

I believe there is an ASRB. The first time Shannon compiled the script, there were errors.

The optimal number of loops will need to be listened to back to back.

[Steven]

Shannon or anyone who can quote a post where Shannon might have answered this,

For the hybrid track, is it only more powerful than just the masked track or just the ultrasonic track if we use headphones, or do we still get that added power of the hybrid if we use speakers?

[Shawn]

Shannon, since there's no ASRB, does that mean we don't need to listen to the 3 loops back to back to back? Or has the technology evolved beyond that, to where we need all three loops in one session?

I believe there is an ASRB. The first time Shannon compiled the script, there were errors.

The optimal number of loops will need to be listened to back to back.

Yes, there is one (20:3 if I remember correctly for version A). The one with no ASRB was that one with the script error.

[eternity]

Shannon, since there's no ASRB, does that mean we don't need to listen to the 3 loops back to back to back? Or has the technology evolved beyond that, to where we need all three loops in one session?

I believe there is an ASRB. The first time Shannon compiled the script, there were errors.

The optimal number of loops will need to be listened to back to back.

Yes, there is one (20:3 if I remember correctly for version A). The one with no ASRB was that one with the script error.

OKAY i see where shannon mentioned that. hhaah looks like our brain needs rest, after all XD XD

[Blacksheep]

Anyone else notice v2.5 kick in hard after they stopped? I've been off it for 8 days now and I have felt my power increasing! Wtf? Been manifesting some nice girls without thinking about it.

Since stopping just 8 days ago, I feel a strong positive difference in myself. The weeklong break took things to the next level.

[wolverine_i_am]

Anyone else notice v2.5 kick in hard after they stopped? I've been off it for 8 days now and I have felt my power increasing! Wtf? Been manifesting some nice girls without thinking about it.

Since stopping just 8 days ago, I feel a strong positive difference in myself.

A long time friend just contacted me after 5 years and told me she's coming to my city. Interesting.

[Steven]

@Travis

I had moments where I thought it was kicking in harder when I stopped listening to it. Perhaps there is something about not listening to the program that frees up your mind to focus on implementing the program.

[eternity]

Same. It's been about 2 weeks since I listened to the sub (ran e2 for a month) and it's sinking in super awesome. Like an unshakeable calm permeates my being. AND I'VE BEEN MANIFESTING GIRLS LIKE CRAZY TOO.

[Shannon]

I don't know what exactly that blockage is. It's just that the program did not get a result within 10 months.

There are a variety of possible reasons for this... some of them internal to you and some of them external. If I don't know what the reason is, I don;t know what to do to solve it.

This is part of the reason the old manifestation programs were not expanded further than they were. I have been doing R&D on manifestation to fix this, and they will be rebuilt in 6G.

[Shannon]

Regarding alcohol not being physically addictive, I must heartily disagree. I used to work in a hospital during college. My job was to sit with patients who were a danger to themselves. Many were alcoholics going through detox. The physical symptoms of withdrawal can be so nasty it can literally kill you. I've been with people who have had no idea who they are, where they were, or unable to construct a coherent sentence because their brains were no longer getting the fuel (poison) it had adapted to. DTS, delirium tremens, is nooooo joke.

Physical addiction, and dosage dependent withdrawal, are hardly the same thing.

When you drink heavily and regularly, you can cause your body to become screwed up and it will require a slow decrease in alcohol consumption to back out of that situation. But that has nothing to do with physical addiction. It's a situation in which you cannot change the body chemistry too radically in too short a period of time without causing imbalances. Push it far enough and those imbalances can result in death - but it is a case where there is a requirement for slow removal of the toxin (alcohol), nothing more.

Go from drinking nothing ever to downing a 20 ounce bottle of liquor and see if that doesn't kill you just as effectively as suddenly and completely stopping a hard drinking long term drinker will. Both are the same situation: they are both a state of too much change for the body to deal with in too short a time.

Alcohol is not physically addictive. It can only be psychologically addictive. And it's misunderstandings like this one that perpetuate these ideas.

So what you're saying is this?
http://https://www.drugabuse.gov/publica...dependence

I get a 404 error on that. But ultimately, I'm not interested in debating it. If you disagree with me still, we will agree to disagree.

[Shannon]

Personally, I dont believe subliminals or our subconscious mind can affect people and cause them to do things. Like with DMSI, I dont think we can cause our subconscious to make them want to have sex with us and make them initiate. I dont believe the subconscious has that capacity. But what I do know is with subliminals, you can make yourself better and by making yourself better suddenly women will naturally want to have sex with you & will like you. The subconscious can make our energy, auras, emotions ( feelings )& chakras so compelling, so attractive, so powerful, magnetic that we are naturally perceived as the the sexiest & most likeable people around. By changing ourselves, we can get the external results we desire. But I don't believe DMSI trying to change the response of women ( the external ) will succeed. Though, DMSI causes a change in the aura which is good. I like the original DAOS more than DMSI but it focuses on changing the self. That's just my opinion, I could be wrong but I dont think so.

You should definitely not continue using the next few versions of DMSI then. I might prove you wrong.