05-04-2016, 11:53 AM
(05-03-2016, 09:08 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think that running Ephra 2.0 for one month before doing a program is an effecient use of time or do you think its better to run Ephra for longer or not at all?
Like say someone wants to run AM6, would running Ephra 2.0 for a month before hand sort of act as a stage 0 and kinda clear out extra junk so that stage 1 can do some more work? Or do you think that a month really isn't enough for it to do anything substantial enough to consider it worth the time used?
There is no such thing as time wasted running EHPRA 2.0. One day, even one hour, is worth doing if that's all that is possible to do. And the more you clear with EHPRA 2.0, the better your other subs will work. But be careful. You may just find that you like what it's doing so much that 30 days becomes 90 and 90 days becomes more.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!