Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarthXedonias - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 09:49 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 09:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 01:38 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: The really interesting thing about time-line distortion is that there are alternate versions of ourselves that are using the sub even if our current trajectory selves won't actually use it at all. Alternate selves, if you will.

And even more interesting is, can the effects of the sub potentially bleed over into other "self-lines"?

I have been getting what I believe to be TID from 3.3, even though I am not planning to use it. Even my girlfriend has noted it. And if I did use it, I'd be using the version for couples, which should only affect her... but today I was getting reactions from at least 5 different women during lunch that I normally do not see without playing DMSI, and only one of them was my girlfriend... who should be the only one affected if I am playing the version for couples...

...which I wasn't even planning to make until 3.4 or later!

This sort of thing has been going on for about a week now, too. Blink

@Shannon hmm that does sound interesting because I do remember you saying you wouldn't run it because I think you said you modeled what would happen and it had a high chance of putting your relationship at risk. Also, that your girlfriend would want to run it as well. So either it could probably be TID as far as 3.4 or maybe you might run 3.3 afterward with her having no interest in running it maybe?

Also, glad to hear Sleep Aid might be done then you might work on a focus fire and 3.3. Granted, I would have loved to have US/LM but I understand it would have turned into a bigger project than it was suppose to be. Also, the fact that we might get 3.3 between a month or 2 more than makes up for that anyway. Btw, what is the plan after you make 3.4? Will you just focus solely on getting beast to design spec and farm the tech from it so you can make 6G? Also, I think you said ASC 6G would be the first sub then a custom for the second. Will the custom be released eventually to the public for that one?

@Shannon I think you might have missed this one I posted. I think it might have been while you were replying to the other ones.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 07-21-2018

Hi, Shannon,

One quick question regarding the future iterations of DMSI: auric shielding is making it back in, correct?

Thanks!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 01:18 PM)Have at ye Wrote: Hi, Shannon,

One quick question regarding the future iterations of DMSI: auric shielding is making it back in, correct?

Thanks!

What is auric shielding ?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - sushi521 - 07-21-2018

(07-19-2018, 04:39 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-19-2018, 03:13 PM)THolt Wrote: Hey @Shannon how is the development of B17 going?

Also what programs are you likely to develop other than UM/OP while you are developing DSMI 3.3?

B17 is not being developed right now because I don't have time. Development is sporadic, but it is fascinating and exciting. I just don't have enough time in a day most days.

I am going to develop a program to trigger the hair on the head and the fingernails to grow faster, stronger and longer, and I might also work on US/LM and Awakener.

Sleep Induction Aid 2.0 is turning out to be a lot more challenging than I expected; converting the 5.5G skeleton script to "instant on/instant off" requires a LOT of modules be checked for whether or not they should be active. I thought I would have been finished building it today, but I have only checked half of them and identified the other half, so hopefully tomorrow.

Hey Shannon, are you building the hair program after Sleep Aid? If so when can we expect to get it?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Blazedo - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 10:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 08:06 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote:
(07-20-2018, 06:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: The first work to stop and reverse hair thinning and graying went into 3.2. I'm guessing that you still want it to be added to by your question?
That's great news that it was added on 3.2 I was not aware of that!

By first work do you mean you will be adding more to the script in regards to thinning hair for 3.3??

I had not been planning to, but if it is still necessary, I can.

I have not seen any improvement in hair growth after using 3.2 (although my hair color seems to have changed a little, going brown on the sides from having been full blonde)

My hair started thinning back on 3.1, so my personal opinion is that it certainly wouldn't hurt to add/improve the reverse hair-thinning module for 3.3


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 09:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: And even more interesting is, can the effects of the sub potentially bleed over into other "self-lines"?

I have been getting what I believe to be TID from 3.3, even though I am not planning to use it. Even my girlfriend has noted it. And if I did use it, I'd be using the version for couples, which should only affect her... but today I was getting reactions from at least 5 different women during lunch that I normally do not see without playing DMSI, and only one of them was my girlfriend... who should be the only one affected if I am playing the version for couples...

...which I wasn't even planning to make until 3.4 or later!

This sort of thing has been going on for about a week now, too. Blink

I have the thought you may have invented P7 at some point which would have a much wider effect back in time. I know you said it's not possible, but you already said with P5.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Sterling - 07-21-2018

(07-19-2018, 02:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-19-2018, 11:45 AM)Smuggler Wrote: Shannon, quick question regarding DMSI. It was mentioned at some point during development of 3.2 about a feature to do with sniping somebody by looking at a photo/online picture? Not much was mentioned about it, did it make it into the release, if so how does one go about activating it, is it just as simple as looking at a picture?

The ability to snipe within line of sight has been in place since V1.0, and the ability to snipe at any distance based on an image of someone is a quirk of that. That's the Standard Sniper. It has been there all along.

To make it work, you have to look at the image of the person, and your subconscious should do the rest automatically. The key is, this won't be very valuable unless you have a strong attraction to them, and there is some way for them to know about you and do something about it.

Shannon, while using dmsi 3.1 - 3.2, I have attempted to utilize the picture/online picture approach for several different girls that I am strongly attracted to and they do know me (several I have history with, others are new but chats with me) and they can do something about it. I have used this approach for 30 days - 90 days straight for each individual girl with no success yet.

will the Short Range Sniper and the Standard Sniper be improved upon (increased in strength and effectiveness) in 3.3?

Thanks.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - sushi521 - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 03:18 PM)Blazedo Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 10:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 08:06 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote:
(07-20-2018, 06:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: The first work to stop and reverse hair thinning and graying went into 3.2. I'm guessing that you still want it to be added to by your question?
That's great news that it was added on 3.2 I was not aware of that!

By first work do you mean you will be adding more to the script in regards to thinning hair for 3.3??

I had not been planning to, but if it is still necessary, I can.

I have not seen any improvement in hair growth after using 3.2 (although my hair color seems to have changed a little, going brown on the sides from having been full blonde)

My hair started thinning back on 3.1, so my personal opinion is that it certainly wouldn't hurt to add/improve the reverse hair-thinning module for 3.3

I also experienced a lot of hair loss in a matter of a few months back when I was on 3.1 and still haven't recovered from it. I'm not sure it was because of DMSI, but I did have a lot of fears of the goals of DMSI. I also experienced the falling sensation which Shannon said was a fear response. Would really like to use the hair sub.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jaeger - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 09:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 01:38 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: The really interesting thing about time-line distortion is that there are alternate versions of ourselves that are using the sub even if our current trajectory selves won't actually use it at all. Alternate selves, if you will.

And even more interesting is, can the effects of the sub potentially bleed over into other "self-lines"?

I have been getting what I believe to be TID from 3.3, even though I am not planning to use it. Even my girlfriend has noted it. And if I did use it, I'd be using the version for couples, which should only affect her... but today I was getting reactions from at least 5 different women during lunch that I normally do not see without playing DMSI, and only one of them was my girlfriend... who should be the only one affected if I am playing the version for couples...

...which I wasn't even planning to make until 3.4 or later!

This sort of thing has been going on for about a week now, too. Blink

Now that's interesting... Is there a possibility of DMSI being modified to attract a girlfriend/long term partner?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Benjamin - 07-21-2018

Quote:Apologies if this question has already been asked. Can we transition straight to 3.3 from 3.2 when it is finally released.

As the past versions you want to take time off. 35 days currently as P6 is running in your head. I'm suprised you don't know that as it's been the same for every version. It was 21 days originally, but P6 was upgraded.

Quote:What is auric shielding ?

It's basically protecting you from other peoples negativity affecting you, becoming more impervious to that.

Now that I think of it, even on 3.2 some things that really annoyed me before, that i'd get pissed off and want to argue, on 3.2 I kind of just didn't worry about it and didn't engage like I was more impervious to that negativity. Though that could be Self Esteem programming or other things in 3.2.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 05:24 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Apologies if this question has already been asked. Can we transition straight to 3.3 from 3.2 when it is finally released.

As the past versions you want to take time off. 35 days currently as P6 is running in your head. I'm suprised you don't know that as it's been the same for every version. It was 21 days originally, but P6 was upgraded.

Quote:What is auric shielding ?

It's basically protecting you from other peoples negativity affecting you, becoming more impervious to that.

Now that I think of it, even on 3.2 some things that really annoyed me before, that i'd get pissed off and want to argue, on 3.2 I kind of just didn't worry about it and didn't engage like I was more impervious to that negativity. Though that could be Self Esteem programming or other things in 3.2.

There's disconnection from negativity scripting in 3.2, but auric shielding is something a bit different and a wee bit more esoteric (and turned off in 3.2, compared to 3.1), I think. It's more like an actual "shield" around your aura, preventing stuff that could be harmful or could hinder your aura from being in good shape (and DMSIng). It was turned off to test the difference and free up some more energy for execution.

It would be nice to have it back, though, if possible. I sometimes feel its absence strongly, depending on where I'm at and who's around me, or what vibes some people are sending my way.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - XyzN - 07-21-2018

(07-20-2018, 06:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: The first work to stop and reverse hair thinning and graying went into 3.2.

I noticed my hair loss in the shower has not as been as bad as it has the past few months around the same time I started up 3.2. I was wondering what may have triggered better hair retention (am 24). Though I have also changed a few other lifestyle things so I cant say for sure sadly. I wouldn't say hair growth though, just slowed some of my hair loss I was having.

p.s. I am happy to hear that you were working on a improved version of SleepInduction. I was on the fence about getting the 5.0 version, but I wanted to stick with MSI3.2. I am a chronic insomniac who's had to try various prescriptions that leave me sluggish the next day, so I may have to try this one out when you're done with it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zeroxmachina - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 09:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 01:38 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: The really interesting thing about time-line distortion is that there are alternate versions of ourselves that are using the sub even if our current trajectory selves won't actually use it at all. Alternate selves, if you will.

And even more interesting is, can the effects of the sub potentially bleed over into other "self-lines"?

I have been getting what I believe to be TID from 3.3, even though I am not planning to use it. Even my girlfriend has noted it. And if I did use it, I'd be using the version for couples, which should only affect her... but today I was getting reactions from at least 5 different women during lunch that I normally do not see without playing DMSI, and only one of them was my girlfriend... who should be the only one affected if I am playing the version for couples...

...which I wasn't even planning to make until 3.4 or later!

This sort of thing has been going on for about a week now, too. Blink

I've been in a long-term relationship for quite awhile now, I was really thrilled that you coincided into making one which wouldn't encourage infidelity.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Ryu - 07-21-2018

How does this TID work in DMSI?