+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-09-2016
Oh and the posts about DMSI 3.0 in Shannon's journal are giving me a twinge in the pants! haha
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-09-2016
It's he releasing V3.0.1 next or V3? Or is it the same? I'm getting confused with all the versions.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 04:18 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: It's he releasing V3.0.1 next or V3? Or is it the same? I'm getting confused with all the versions.
I forget what makes it V3.0.1 vs. V3.0, but mind you it's not V3.1. V3.1 would likely be the next iteration after a round of public testing V3.0.1.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 04:19 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-09-2016, 04:18 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: It's he releasing V3.0.1 next or V3? Or is it the same? I'm getting confused with all the versions.
I forget what makes it V3.0.1 vs. V3.0, but mind you it's not V3.1. V3.1 would likely be the next iteration after a round of public testing V3.0.1.
So is he skipping v3.0 and giving us v3.0.1?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 04:24 PM)Aventus45 Wrote:(11-09-2016, 04:19 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-09-2016, 04:18 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: It's he releasing V3.0.1 next or V3? Or is it the same? I'm getting confused with all the versions.
I forget what makes it V3.0.1 vs. V3.0, but mind you it's not V3.1. V3.1 would likely be the next iteration after a round of public testing V3.0.1.
So is he skipping v3.0 and giving us v3.0.1?
That's my understanding.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 04:25 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-09-2016, 04:24 PM)Aventus45 Wrote:(11-09-2016, 04:19 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-09-2016, 04:18 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: It's he releasing V3.0.1 next or V3? Or is it the same? I'm getting confused with all the versions.
I forget what makes it V3.0.1 vs. V3.0, but mind you it's not V3.1. V3.1 would likely be the next iteration after a round of public testing V3.0.1.
So is he skipping v3.0 and giving us v3.0.1?
That's my understanding.
It will be 3.0.1 instead of 3.0.0 because I started 3.0.0 before I created 2.5, and then I added some of the upgrades from 2.5 to 3.0, which made it 3.0.1. It's just a way of helping me make sure I have all the possible upgrades in the script I am working on.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 03:56 PM)Illumi Wrote: Question for Shannon. Do i need a break if i were to switch back to V2.4? I dont mind not having a clean slate, i just want to avoid unneccisary reisitance.
It is a good idea. Jetstream turbulence and all that.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 11-09-2016
So what was that about DMSI making you younger or preserving youth? I remeber Shannon saying that it's an indirect effect. Can someone elaborate?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 07:43 PM)Illumi Wrote: So what was that about DMSI making you younger or preserving youth? I remeber Shannon saying that it's an indirect effect. Can someone elaborate?
I didn't say it will make you younger. I was commenting on how we could explain one person saying that it seemed to be making them appear younger to others.
If you think about it, though, with the OE and all the other tech in place, given that youth is sexually attractive, it makes sense that aging reversal might be a potential side effect.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-09-2016
Shannon,
I wanted to thank you for making so much progress on DMSI today because I know you are busy with other things, and besides... I'm hungry to get v3.x ASAP.
Also that perception alteration is really a cool idea! Almost psychadelic! I've been looking forward to being a 10!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 07:56 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,
I wanted to thank you for making so much progress on DMSI today because I know you are busy with other things, and besides... I'm hungry to get v3.x ASAP.
Also that perception alteration is really a cool idea! Almost psychadelic! I've been looking forward to being a 10!
I am focused on building DMSI 3.0.1 because I am still waiting for contracts to get into the right hands with regards to the custom job. I plan to work on that full time until I get paid for the custom job, and then I will prioritize the custom job. In the mean time I am trying to achieve all I can while I have the opportunity.
I am also hungry for 3.0.1.
But I want to point out to you that I never said 3.0.1 will make you a 10. I said it is designed to increase your perceived attractiveness, status and value as much as possible, and that I believe it is possible to increase it between 1 to 3 points and possibly more. To take a 1 and make them seem to be a 10 to a 10, you would have to use direct hypnosis or NLP likely executed at the master skill and experience level. What I am doing is perceptual alteration through a secondary source (your aura), which I expect to be possible to some degree, but it will surprise the hell out of me if a 1 - 6 could snag a 10 with it.
I am aiming, however, to snag as many 10's for you guys (and myself) as possible.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 07:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-09-2016, 07:43 PM)Illumi Wrote: So what was that about DMSI making you younger or preserving youth? I remeber Shannon saying that it's an indirect effect. Can someone elaborate?
I didn't say it will make you younger. I was commenting on how we could explain one person saying that it seemed to be making them appear younger to others.
If you think about it, though, with the OE and all the other tech in place, given that youth is sexually attractive, it makes sense that aging reversal might be a potential side effect.
Makes sense
thanks for the responce.Edit: I've noticed that i look way better now compared to 3 months ago, and that i have about 60% less acne and skin issues ever since i boarded the DMSI testing train.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-09-2016
(11-09-2016, 08:24 PM)Illumi Wrote:(11-09-2016, 07:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-09-2016, 07:43 PM)Illumi Wrote: So what was that about DMSI making you younger or preserving youth? I remeber Shannon saying that it's an indirect effect. Can someone elaborate?
I didn't say it will make you younger. I was commenting on how we could explain one person saying that it seemed to be making them appear younger to others.
If you think about it, though, with the OE and all the other tech in place, given that youth is sexually attractive, it makes sense that aging reversal might be a potential side effect.
Makes sense
Edit: I've noticed that i look way better now compared to 3 months ago, and that i have about 60% less acne and skin issues ever since i boarded the DMSI testing train.
It's gonna get better with 3.0.1.... heh heh heh...
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 11-09-2016
Shannon if I've got about a month and a half before I start AM6 again am I better off having a longer break or running stage 7 until x weeks before I start (how many weeks?). I don't feel like I've fully accepted AM6, will stage 7 be detrimental? How does stage 7 compare to stage 6? It seems like stage 6 is meant to be close to the full script from the FAQ?