![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016 (11-07-2016, 12:55 PM)hunk Wrote:(11-07-2016, 12:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5. Alright, Ben, if you would do the honors and temporarily enable the older single stage version of BASE... This will be temporary, and anyone who misses it, misses it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-07-2016 Shannon, How exciting about your new fragrance! Please keep us posted! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016 (11-07-2016, 02:19 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, It is a BEAR to make. 25 different ingredients. 23 count as "notes", and only two or three are consciously obvious. It's really making me think of perfumery as a form of art, because this is very much reminding me of a work of art that has been given the most careful attention to detail. It sometimes took days to figure out... do I prefer 3 units of X, or 4? Especially when certain of the key components cost in excess of $1,400 per ounce. Especially when X is intended to have a steering effect, and not be an obviously detectable note in and of itself. Especially when I literally cannot smell the component! But... so far... very beautiful. #38 or #41, it won't be cheap to make. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 11-07-2016 I Have the single stage BASE already but would like to READ about it all over again. where may I find such in the store or ? I Looked in the store and found BASE 500$ one,but not the 24.50$ one. thanx. Keith. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016 (11-07-2016, 02:53 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: I Have the single stage BASE already but would like to READ about it all over again. where may I find such in the store or ? I Looked in the store and found BASE 500$ one,but not the 24.50$ one. thanx. Keith. When Ben re-enables it, it will be available in the store. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Narcissus - 11-07-2016 (11-07-2016, 02:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-07-2016, 02:53 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: I Have the single stage BASE already but would like to READ about it all over again. where may I find such in the store or ? I Looked in the store and found BASE 500$ one,but not the 24.50$ one. thanx. Keith. I know this is not the place to post this apologies Shannon but I couldn't hold my excitement haha But how do I get the v 2.1? I have already bought the 2.5 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-07-2016 Quote:Since when did my thread become the WWF Dating Channel? Am I the only one that thought this when I read this comment? ![]() Ok, i'll make the DMSI v1 links and enable BASE. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016 Sexual Chocolate! The next fragrance I create! (No, seriously... That's what I was gonna name it!) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-07-2016 (11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(11-07-2016, 08:36 AM)K-Train Wrote: A couple things Shannon. First off, congrats on your recent epiphany concerning sexual safeness. I had someone explain something similar to me except they used the analogy of an airplane pilot. Basically, if you got on an airplane and looked into the cockpit and saw two blind pilots you would feel unsafe. On the other hand, if you saw two pilots talking the pilot lingo and moving their hands and body with confidence, you would feel safe. That safeness motivates you to get on that plane and relax. Hm...I'd have to take a few days off before switching, though with P4 running through my head, I wonder how effective that'd be? I am curious, now that I have zero interest in alcohol at the moment, if my interest would return again running V1. I drank like a fish on V1. It may be a good test to see how much of that fear I've truly overcome. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016 If you're going to use V1 and have no residual effects from 2.5, you will definitely need at least 5 to 7 days off of 2.5. Even that is unlikely to give you a completely clean slate. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-07-2016 How do I get v1? I already have v2.5? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 11-07-2016 So just wondering about the the time off from V2.4/2.5 to V1. Shannon says you'd need at least 5- 7 days for a clean slate but what happens if someone were to run V1 a short while after using the newer versions? Would that cause resistance or just overbleeding in effect! Edit: In other words is it ok to run V1 16 hours after V2.5? If so then im game. I've never used V1 on its own aside with AM6 which of came with the worst resistance possible. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-07-2016 BASE single stage and DMSI V1 are done. They will be with the 2.5 links. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 11-07-2016 What is the recommended number of loops for v1, I'm sure there wasn't a limit? |