Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 (11-05-2016, 09:15 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-05-2016, 08:05 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-05-2016, 06:46 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-04-2016, 09:24 PM)Shannon Wrote: People are strange that way. "Oh, you work from home? Obviously you don't really work so let's **** around and do useless shit that wastes your time." Seems to be the thinking. I believe it can help, yes, but of course the newer version will be significantly more powerful. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 (11-05-2016, 01:22 PM)D77 Wrote: @Shannon: That's a lot of stuff to think about. Generally not the direction I am going, but I will consider it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 (11-05-2016, 02:10 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(11-05-2016, 08:38 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-05-2016, 08:35 AM)Roy Wrote:(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals. That's sort of "meet her half way" programming already present. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 01:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:days or weeks?(11-05-2016, 08:17 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I can't seem to find the answer on the forums. Simple question. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 01:05 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us. This is the problem with this forum right now, everyone's so bogged down by their own experiences that they refuse to think about anything differently, makes progress as a community impossible. Everyone's trying to be polite and politically correct in the men's forum lol. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 Guys - the design goals of DMSI are to get them to approach and initiate and have sex with you. Whether you're male or female, whether you're gay or straight, whether whatever. Those are the design goals. In other words... make you so sexy that they want to act. That doesn't make anyone lazy for trying to see if it works. It also doesn't mean you should become a jellyfish and do nothing when you see an opportunity to make something happen! NSFM is designed to get the user to naturally seduce the women he finds attractive. DMSI is designed to get the women he finds attractive to seduce him. Putting them both together may or may not work, but ultimately it's just training wheels, until we get the script to where it's doing what the original design goals are: Natural Seduction For Everyone But You. Sitting on your ass waiting for the world to happen is what women do, and it's why they miss out on 99.9% of decent guys who could make them happy. When you're using DMSI, do your thing. If it works, they may beat you to it. And, you may have women you didn't expect making the moves on you! But never waste an opportunity to seize the day. If you're interested, go say something! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 01:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote:weeks(11-06-2016, 01:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:days or weeks?(11-05-2016, 08:17 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I can't seem to find the answer on the forums. Simple question. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 01:05 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us. Limitations, hunh? This coming from the guy that thinks you're "giving away your male power" if you say hello to a woman in public. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 03:05 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:05 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us. 1st of all, I'm pretty sure I have more balls then you in that area. I've pushed things things and made things happen that are way beyond what's socially acceptable. 2nd of all I can tell you from experience that as soon as you pursue a girl, you lose power to her, whether you know it or not. There are a lot better ways for things to happen trust me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 03:50 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:05 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:05 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us. lol. ok. yarrrgh matey's, these be treacherous waters. The blimey AMOGs are afoot and they be hankerin' for trouble!!!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 03:56 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:50 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:05 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:05 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: What the **** is happening to this forum?! As much as I agree with you chaos, there is indeed something to what he's saying. Unless I'm more socially retarded than I realize, any time I've gone and tried to make something happen with a girl after she has shown interest she has lost interest instantly. Like I said, there's something to it. It's like there's a certain way to respond to women. I dunno anything beyond that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 03:56 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:50 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:05 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:05 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: What the **** is happening to this forum?! You shouldn't be intimidated by AMOGS, btw. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 04:01 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:56 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:50 PM)2Cozy Wrote:(11-06-2016, 03:05 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:05 PM)2Cozy Wrote: As a matter of fact I would lol, it wouldn't be a big deal to me, I would treat her like anyone else. Don't project your limitations onto me. No. There isn't. There's a vast difference between pursuing a woman -- as in chasing (and thus treating her as the prize) -- and approaching a woman to talk to her. 4Kingdoms keeps asking why I have such success with DMSI in the past. The answer is simple: I approach, I tell them I want them and voila! The times that I have been passive (like with #3), I ended up losing the woman, because passivity is NOT natural for men. You can walk around with as much charged hate as you want, and very few women will approach and talk to you unless you're famous or you're built like a Greek god. That's the natural order of things. As a man, you're the expansive force, the force that hunts, the force that penetrates. She's the passive receiver. Look at the sex act itself: You penetrate. You fuck her senseless until she can do nothing but babble. You care only about your own pleasure, and she derives her pleasure from you getting off! In the natural state of things, no matter what the SJWs say, no matter what the AMOGs say, no matter what the zen masters say -- she will NEVER actively hunt and pursue a man. Hence, why DMSI is such a big deal. It actually bends natural law (without breaking it, hence one of the reasons Shannon probably shies away from a conscious sniper module -- you'd be interfering with will). This even applies in the animal world, where the female will present herself to the male (IOIs) and the male must still make the approach and claim her as his own. In primal days, the man would approach the woman and bonk her over the head with a rock, then take her away for the fuckin'. But still, the masculine essence is the agent that impresses his will upon a person. Whether it's fair or not, whether we like it or not, this the way the universe operates. It's constantly moving toward perfection, and it doesn't give a fuck about how the individual person feels about it. These processes want the strong to survive, thrive and procreate and the weak to die off. Sitting on your laurels, claiming to be alpha because you're doing NOTHING is insane. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-06-2016 Quote:Where did Shannon ever say the subliminal eliminates the option to speak to women? He didn't but that's how everyone is acting and I don't want it to be pushed in that direction because so many people seem to be talking in that direction. As I said in the post it seems to be creating this attitude of "oh this woman come right over to me, took her pants off and I did nothing because she should do everything". And WTF.. half these other arguments i'm seeing are obviously coming from reading too much pua material and theory without actual experience and it hurts my head. I was going to respond to it but it's of no value for me to do so. Quote:I don't understand why the choice is so binary, isn't it possible to have both? Maximize DMSI to have women approach you, but also give you the ability to approach women? Yep that's what I was trying to say. Quote:Sitting on your ass waiting for the world to happen is what women do, and it's why they miss out on 99.9% of decent guys who could make them happy. Yep exactly, I was going to say something like that. And Quote: It also doesn't mean you should become a jellyfish and do nothing when you see an opportunity to make something happen! This is exactly the mentality some people are getting into. I just used 2.4 for like 2 days, I mentioned a woman in an opshop come right over, stand next to me and give a big smile and I naturally said hi, and there's the conversation. WIth the mindset that i'm seeing here though there would be some people like "NO.. she's meant to do more" when what she did was pretty damn big and obvious for a woman. |