Subliminal Talk
Subliminals in Porn - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Other Topics (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Other-Topics)
+--- Forum: The Chatter Box (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-The-Chatter-Box)
+--- Thread: Subliminals in Porn (/Thread-Subliminals-in-Porn)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


RE: Subliminals in Porn - SargeMaximus - 12-20-2015

(12-20-2015, 06:07 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote: Just remember while you people are spending all your energy thinking about me and talking about me, I prob don't even know your user name on here LMAO!

Dude, who are you talking to? I certainly don't hate you. :/

These kinds of posts just make you seem even more paranoid. I've honestly seen no evidence of "hating" towards you, just some disagreements and lashing out. Huh


RE: Subliminals in Porn - Benjamin - 12-20-2015

Quote:whenever you repeatedly lodge personal attacks/harsh subjective criticisms it's going to make the moderators consider reaching for the banhammer.

This is exactly it and is why others have been banned, and they always default to the argument "oh it's because of my opinions" which is not the case at all. Thanks K-train.

I can't say i've seen others talk to you in that same manner as much as you are attacking most people. I don't know how you're putting this down to people being 'haters'.

Quote:Just remember while you people are spending all your energy thinking about me and talking about me, I prob don't even know your user name on here LMAO!

Rolleyes


RE: Subliminals in Porn - apollolux - 12-20-2015

(12-20-2015, 02:23 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 01:17 PM)apollolux Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 12:50 AM)Benjamin Wrote: I had to edit out any direct religious stuff, as for illuminati talk i'm checking if that's appropriate.

Aw, you edited mine :/ I was being sarcastic to mock ignorant people for finding excuses to post nonsense that doesn't actually prove anything, but I guess "ZOMG" doesn't convey sarcasm and mocking enough in text form.

You mean you wanted to act like you know about stuff you've never studied, and that makes you educated and me ignorant...

I wasn't directing at you, I was mocking people who don't know what they're talking about. I consider you part of the educated people being annoyed by nonsensical people conveying fake conspiracy theories like "Obama is pro-Muslim" because they're brainwashed sheep and are likely employed to misdirect legit causes. And don't make assumptions about what I have and haven't studied, you don't know my life and the nonsense I've had to put up with over its course.

(12-20-2015, 02:23 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote: It's funny because I know both sides, you know one. You say heads is on one side of the coin and then refuse to believe tails is on the other side, and you've never even looked at the other side.

It's very easy to watch a few videos, not understand what you're seeing, and then start mocking and pretending to be smart.

You're putting words in my mouth and assuming I'm closed-minded. You say "you don't know what you don't know," and that's usually true, but on top of that you don't know what I actually know. And the specific video I'm mocking I understood perfectly and THAT video is evidence of a nonsense conspiracy theorist pretending to be smart by claiming Obama is an anti-christ by "using math" which for no good reason included calculating some numbers related to the racehorse American Pharaoh. I will wholeheartedly mock people like Donald Trump who, when presented with definitively conclusive proof, still believe nonsense like Obama isn't American, even more so if they choose to sully something as objectively definitive as math with their nonsense.

(12-20-2015, 02:23 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote: Don't comment on subjects you know nothing about and act like you know what you're not even aware of.

THAT, is what is ignorant, but maybe you're too ignorant to even know what the word ignorant means before using it.

With your logic, I'd assume that's accurate.

Read up on events "associated" with the "shemitah" (or however it's actually spelled) with a scientific approach and tell me truly and honestly if you believe it's real or simply fear-mongering with coincidences, then come back and dare to call me ignorant again. I don't appreciate people making assumptions about what I do or don't know with absolutely no proof to back it up, I had to deal with more than enough of that bull from closed-minded supposedly religious people using religion to justify their abusive actions towards me.

TheRealJustin Wrote:Why is it okay for people to talk this way to me, and not okay for me to talk back in an exact equal manner?

Why did you automatically assume I referred to you in the mocking in question? If I was going to insult you I'd mention you by name because I'm a direct and straightforward person, but I didn't insult you and I don't want to insult you because you're one of the few Americans on here who I believe is a REAL person who's had REAL experiences and knows what it's like to make his own way rather than a whiny spoiled baby who would make requests for subs with no intent to buy and actually use them and complain when things aren't going their way.

Justin, you very much overreacted to what I wrote and made assumptions about me and my intent that are completely wrong. Chill out.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - Benjamin - 12-20-2015

Apollolux again remember rule 4. I talked to Andrew and illuminati stuff is okay for now as long as it doesn't go into religious type talk.

But honestly this thread seems to be getting out of hand as it is.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - TheRealJustin - 12-20-2015

(12-20-2015, 07:55 PM)K-Train Wrote: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! RealJustin I knew there was something very familiar in your writing style the moment you started going off! You're a listener to my boy Alan Roger Currie! You mentioned it in the RSD thread in the chatter box. I love that dude! MOOOOOOOOOOOODE ONE!!!!

On topic though, you having an opinion about the stuff here technically isn't bannable unless you were spouting a bunch of ISIS propaganda in which case...yeah you'd probably be banned lol. The thing is though on THIS particular forum (can't speak for others) whenever you repeatedly lodge personal attacks/harsh subjective criticisms it's going to make the moderators consider reaching for the banhammer. Benjamin himself has been apart of some forums where the banhammer was swung with reckless abandon so he's very lenient and doesn't like reaching for it in the vast majority of cases.

I know Alan is real big on peeps being their real authentic self and communicating in a straightforward manner so if your writing style and the way you respond to people is what you've displayed then I'm NOT going to tell you to change. I AM going to say that in all likelihood your real authentic self probably won't last here. You can chalk that up to whatever you believe (favoritism, haters, combination of the two, etc.). I know you CAN talk to people because in the overwhelming majority of the discussions between you and I we've never insulted each other.

I saw some of the forums where Alan was banned from. What i saw (again I didn't see everything, this is just my personal observation from the instances i remember) Alan presented his point, didn't hurl personal attacks or subjective criticisms (at first lol) and the individuals in particular came at HIM with personal attacks which prompted the argument/heated debate. You seem to be following a similar trend here although in some cases particularly in the "Am6 didn't work" thread it could be argued that you instigated some of the situations by insulting the vast majority of forum populace and the creator.

Your beliefs and opinions are what they are and in some cases here I can understand your response and will even admit that I myself am NOT perfect, WILL probably in the future say stuff that may not be "politically correct" or "nice", or whatever, and probably hurl subjective criticisms at others during a disagreement or debate. Sometimes (not every time and not all the time) though man, you just have to agree to disagree and move on.

I treat people how they treat me. If people are nice to me I'm nice to them, if they're rude to me then I'm rude to them.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - TheRealJustin - 12-20-2015

(12-20-2015, 07:58 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 06:07 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote: Just remember while you people are spending all your energy thinking about me and talking about me, I prob don't even know your user name on here LMAO!

Dude, who are you talking to? I certainly don't hate you. :/

These kinds of posts just make you seem even more paranoid. I've honestly seen no evidence of "hating" towards you, just some disagreements and lashing out. Huh

I don't know who I'm talking about because it's people I don't know talking sh*t behind the scenes messaging Ben trying to get me banned n sh*t.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - TheRealJustin - 12-20-2015

(12-20-2015, 08:11 PM)apollolux Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 02:23 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 01:17 PM)apollolux Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 12:50 AM)Benjamin Wrote: I had to edit out any direct religious stuff, as for illuminati talk i'm checking if that's appropriate.

Aw, you edited mine :/ I was being sarcastic to mock ignorant people for finding excuses to post nonsense that doesn't actually prove anything, but I guess "ZOMG" doesn't convey sarcasm and mocking enough in text form.

You mean you wanted to act like you know about stuff you've never studied, and that makes you educated and me ignorant...

I wasn't directing at you, I was mocking people who don't know what they're talking about. I consider you part of the educated people being annoyed by nonsensical people conveying fake conspiracy theories like "Obama is pro-Muslim" because they're brainwashed sheep and are likely employed to misdirect legit causes. And don't make assumptions about what I have and haven't studied, you don't know my life and the nonsense I've had to put up with over its course.

(12-20-2015, 02:23 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote: It's funny because I know both sides, you know one. You say heads is on one side of the coin and then refuse to believe tails is on the other side, and you've never even looked at the other side.

It's very easy to watch a few videos, not understand what you're seeing, and then start mocking and pretending to be smart.

You're putting words in my mouth and assuming I'm closed-minded. You say "you don't know what you don't know," and that's usually true, but on top of that you don't know what I actually know. And the specific video I'm mocking I understood perfectly and THAT video is evidence of a nonsense conspiracy theorist pretending to be smart by claiming Obama is an anti-christ by "using math" which for no good reason included calculating some numbers related to the racehorse American Pharaoh. I will wholeheartedly mock people like Donald Trump who, when presented with definitively conclusive proof, still believe nonsense like Obama isn't American, even more so if they choose to sully something as objectively definitive as math with their nonsense.

(12-20-2015, 02:23 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote: Don't comment on subjects you know nothing about and act like you know what you're not even aware of.

THAT, is what is ignorant, but maybe you're too ignorant to even know what the word ignorant means before using it.

With your logic, I'd assume that's accurate.

Read up on events "associated" with the "shemitah" (or however it's actually spelled) with a scientific approach and tell me truly and honestly if you believe it's real or simply fear-mongering with coincidences, then come back and dare to call me ignorant again. I don't appreciate people making assumptions about what I do or don't know with absolutely no proof to back it up, I had to deal with more than enough of that bull from closed-minded supposedly religious people using religion to justify their abusive actions towards me.

TheRealJustin Wrote:Why is it okay for people to talk this way to me, and not okay for me to talk back in an exact equal manner?

Why did you automatically assume I referred to you in the mocking in question? If I was going to insult you I'd mention you by name because I'm a direct and straightforward person, but I didn't insult you and I don't want to insult you because you're one of the few Americans on here who I believe is a REAL person who's had REAL experiences and knows what it's like to make his own way rather than a whiny spoiled baby who would make requests for subs with no intent to buy and actually use them and complain when things aren't going their way.

Justin, you very much overreacted to what I wrote and made assumptions about me and my intent that are completely wrong. Chill out.

idk who else you would have been talking about, but if you weren't talking about me then good.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - Spareness - 12-20-2015

(12-20-2015, 08:31 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Apollolux again remember rule 4. I talked to Andrew and illuminati stuff is okay for now as long as it doesn't go into religious type talk.

But honestly this thread seems to be getting out of hand as it is.

Ben, I remember a thread which one I mean.

here it is http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1595.html

In that thread turned out talking about spiritual organization. After that I did a little research, and indeed there is a bond between the Illuminati and religion. But the rest is like what Andrew said.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - SargeMaximus - 12-20-2015

(12-20-2015, 08:53 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 07:58 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(12-20-2015, 06:07 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote: Just remember while you people are spending all your energy thinking about me and talking about me, I prob don't even know your user name on here LMAO!

Dude, who are you talking to? I certainly don't hate you. :/

These kinds of posts just make you seem even more paranoid. I've honestly seen no evidence of "hating" towards you, just some disagreements and lashing out. Huh

I don't know who I'm talking about because it's people I don't know talking sh*t behind the scenes messaging Ben trying to get me banned n sh*t.

Well if you're not doing anything wrong, you don't have to worry. On the other hand, if you start hating and flaming, you ARE doling something wrong and CAN get banned. Just sayin', again, no hate, I think you're a cool guy and would hate to see you banned so I don't want you to do anything crazy.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - Daredevil - 12-21-2015

What have I started? Ben, Please close or delete this thread.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - Benjamin - 12-21-2015

Quote:In that thread turned out talking about spiritual organization. After that I did a little research, and indeed there is a bond between the Illuminati and religion. But the rest is like what Andrew said.

Yeah ok well if it can be discussed without going into religion that's okay for now atleast.

Quote:sure hope these guys (?) haven't done the alpha male subs.........

The issue was already there, the reaction to this seems a little paranoid though.

Quote:On the other hand, if you start hating and flaming, you ARE doling something wrong and CAN get banned.

Again yes.

Quote:What have I started? Ben, Please close or delete this thread.

It's cool, it isn't you. The issue was already there it's just been confronted in this thread.


RE: Subliminals in Porn - mat422 - 12-21-2015

To get back on the topic at hand. I could see how companies would want to use subliminals in porn, but I think it would be in attempt to just get people to buy more porn lol.

In all seriousness I think mind programming methods are powerful, but even with subliminals it doesn't just pour right into your brain and effect you. Evidence of that would be guys on this forum dealing with a lot of resistance to a subliminal that will improve their life. If they are having that much trouble on something they want, imagine how much the mind would reject it if they know they don't.

I mean what do you consider submissive behavior? Like over consuming on material goods and going through life like human cattle never questioning why they do the things they do?


RE: Subliminals in Porn - Dzemoo - 12-25-2015

(12-18-2015, 06:13 PM)TheRealJustin Wrote:
(12-18-2015, 05:31 PM)Hercules Wrote: So I just was reaserchching Whilem Reichs stuff in orgasm in. which he talks about that the Subconcious is most receptive in the orgastic state. This has made me think that why don't the powers that be use this to their advantage and put Subliminals in porn or sigils. I've been wanking for 4 years and I've stopped completely and on day 13 of no fap. Porn has really torn apart my life. With millions of men wanking why not use that to manifest a reality that they desire. I mean they have been reasearching this since the 50s with MK ultra. It also seems they have a war on men with measures to take down and make males submissive. This includes estrogen everywhere in baby formula, plastics, water and being sprayed in the crops as pesticides. Combine that with wanking you get a submissive population. What are your thoughts.

Lol, most people don't realize the illuminati is turning everyone gay and into cross dressers and tranny's and stuff. The people on top will get all the women and money and the people on the bottom are left to fu*k each other up the butt lmao.

You're a smart guy to realize that they are turning men into submissives to the point where a lot even want to become women and see themselves as women. It's horrible, but this world is run behind the scenes by truly wicked people.

@realjustin you get it

@hercules thats why we all should use anti estrogens

atd, bromo, arimstane,formastane, and nolvadex are good ones to choose

20mg tamoxifen citrate is enough to make you feel more manly and dominant

the estrogens and progestins are fucking up our minds